3
Products
reviewed
141
Products
in account

Recent reviews by ,=,e

Showing 1-3 of 3 entries
1 person found this review helpful
15.5 hrs on record (13.7 hrs at review time)
Most people that I know, this game runs fine. In my first game I had some hitches but I changed AA to FXAA, and it seems to run better. Compared to last years Cod4: Remastered, this runs loads better but could still use improvements.

Positive:
- Is fun to run and gun again without having to worry about wall running and double jumps, or other futuristic annoyances.
- The fact activision made a PC beta for a CoD to tweak and improve the game before it comes out on PC, hopefully they can figure out quick hotfixes for the beta, or if not atleast have significant improvements for the release.
- Actually proper settings to tweak, FOV, FPS and a lot of graphical modification possibilities.

Negative:
- Time to kill is quite inconsistent
- PPSH-41 is clearly the best ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ gun in the game already.
- Too much waiting between games, the after game scoreboard screen should be like 3 seconds not 15 seconds.
-The lobby system as far friends go is bad, not sure why they changed it from having a list of players in your party on the main screen to what it is in this game, where you have to go to a completely different tab to check who is and isn't in your lobby.

Overall, this has been fairly enjoyable.

I actually like the fact that this beta is getting so much negative reviews, hopefully this means Sledgehammer will be more onpoint with fixing issues.
Posted September 28, 2017.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
No one has rated this review as helpful yet
5.3 hrs on record (5.0 hrs at review time)
poop

3/10 ign
Posted July 18, 2016.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
5 people found this review helpful
45.9 hrs on record (31.9 hrs at review time)
Performance is utter poop. Worst PC port of all time..... that's what happens when you give the game TO A CONSOLE STUDIO to port a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ PC game.
How can a game of this calibre be allowed to be given to some ammature studio, they probably didn't even check how the game ran on their own test PC's before they gave it to steam.

The game has very few graphical settings to be able to get the best out of your computer. The graphics options might as well say | graphics [YES] | NO |

If the opimization fix comes, I'm going to replay the game to get a smooth and enjoyable experience.

Ugh..... well


Story is really good. Scarecrow with the arkham knight was a good combo of badies. If you don't follow batman stories at all. The Story was built so you get the gist of who the Arkham Knight is. I've know who he is, ever since I saw that this is going to be the new game.

-The combat system from what I felt was pretty much the same with Origins couple of things to make it look even more brutal.
-FEAR addition is cool as ♥♥♥♥ and OP, but it's batman so he is already OP, so it doesn't matter, they could've probably made some quick time event or something for this rather than just point and click.
-Batmobile was a nice feature, works well but you do spend quite a lot of time with it.
-Upgrade screen is nice and it provides nice upgrades(dur)

Side story/missions:
-Riddler has a more fun playable little sideline story with catwoman. Just little puzzles, but those were quite easy sadly but atleast it was something new( and yes you need to gather all the trophies to get to the final riddler boss fight).
-Two-face/firefly/penguin all of them had a couple of missions but they were all fairly similar still fun.
And other stuff. Loads characters apperances.

The story side and game mechanics are very good and fun. But this game was ruined by this horrible PC launch with all the bugs, performance issues and errors.

Like the game doesn't even have a MOUSE SENSITIVITY SLIDER or some form of a CHANGER, you have to go into the games files to do that. FPS capped at 30fps, also had change that in the files.
Posted June 25, 2015.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
Showing 1-3 of 3 entries