194 people found this review helpful
29 people found this review funny
Recommended
0.0 hrs last two weeks / 16.4 hrs on record (13.6 hrs at review time)
Posted: Jul 25, 2019 @ 10:02am
Updated: Jul 25, 2019 @ 11:01am
Product received for free

Before the game came out and before I got a review key, Youngblood wasn't really on the top of my list of "to-play games". While I enjoyed both The New Order back in 2014 and its stand-alone expansion The Old Blood, the proper sequel - The New Colossus - was, to me, an underwhewlming experience with not a very memorable story and at times horrid level design. For those reason, and some others, I didn't took much interest in Youngblood. And perhaps that's the reason why I find it so incredible in the end.

The new characters of Jessie and Zofia Blazkowicz might not be nearly as iconic as B.J. Blazkowicz himself, but they really fit the the new approach the game took in terms of its basic story telling. Instead of number of well done cut-scenes throughout the game telling the story of Blazkowicz's Nazi-kiling adventure, Wolfenstein: Youngblood, instead, focuses primarily on the gameplay, with its story being told through on-the-move dialogues and banter between the sisters.

Because of that, the game kind of feels fluid and as if you were to never really stop. That is even more apparent when you take in the fact that the two sisters always kill together. Whether you're playing solo and with a competent AI partner or coop with a real player, you're never alone, the game is twice as fast, twice as fast and there's twice as many dead enemies. Which, of course, is excellent.

The level design, which I REALLY didn't like in The New Colossus, has also been 'fixed' and massively improved. With the help of Arkane Studios (Dishonored, Prey), the game's various open-ended locations feature much more ways to approach any and each part of the level and is also much more vertical. While that might scream that stealth is now finally a viable option - especially considering the new cheesy cloak ability - it's sadly not and sooner or later, everything goes back to the mindless-Nazi-killing status quo we know, and, arguably, love.

Of course, not everything is perfect in Wolfenstein: Youngblood and I'd really love if the game was generally longer (playing throug the main storyline takes up about 8 hours), the story was more interesting, the enemies weren't nearly as dumb as they are and there were some tweaks to the new 'enemy armor' mechanic. You see, every enemy in the game now has either a light armor, or a heavy armor. Meanwhile, each of your weapons is either useful againts one or the other type. Shotgun is capable of pretty much ignoring the light armor and just destroy hordes of smaller humanoid enemies, while your assault rifle is more effective againts the harder armor worn by bigger enemies and robots. On paper, and partially in practice, it's a mechanic I really like and enjoy, giving the combat a bit more depth and forcing players to think and change weapons accordingly. The problem is, changing weapons isn't very fast (hurting the tempo of the fights as some deaf moments appear when changing weapons and you're forced to endure the enemy fire without the option to defend yourself) and not nearly as intuitive in the heat of batle.

Although it's kind of a nitpick, really, it does eventually wear the excitement down, and once you learn to change the weapons almost automatically, the combat starts to feel same-y and it goes back to status quo once again.

Through and through, Wolfenstein: Youngblood is, especially for its price, what I'd consider an excellent summer time-killer with mindless action and a little bit of story and lore sprinkled around. Fans of the new Wolfenstein series should love this, but you should not expect any kind of revolution, innovation or modernization.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
22 Comments
Orca extravaganza Jul 31, 2019 @ 6:25pm 
"product received for free"

ok, here's a big issue, while the game isn't "as bad" as most say, it's an average game, but compared to other wolfensteins it's a "bad game", for the price 30$ is 30$ too much the moment this MTX garbage is included, period, no debate, F2P does not belong in pay to play games

now if this game was free, i'd have zero issue, and if you get this game for free, of course you're gonna rate and perceive it a lot higher than those who payed 30-40$ like most people did.

that's where a lot of issues lie, that "received for free"
CarnageInc. Jul 29, 2019 @ 1:58pm 
You can say you aren't one and I will say you are one and will end it there since this is just going in circles.
Metacritics "professional media" rating is a 75 but user is at 2.9 or 3 now.
If you don't want folks calling you a shill then buy the game and give it a review.

Honzas4400 Jul 29, 2019 @ 2:22am 
Point in case - in case of professional reviews on Metacritic, the game has rating of ~75 with review score going from 86 to all the way to low 60's. If someone didn't enjoy the game on Steam, they'll give it a thumbs down, but that doesn't mean that person rated it 0/10, period. It's not nearly as simple of a system. Likewise, just because I gave it thumbs up doesn't mean I rated it 10/10 best game ever made; there's plenty of reviews showing and presenting why certain aspects of the game are good or bad, depending on the person. I happened to enjoy the game enough to warrant a thumbs up, but I'm not saying it's a game I'd choose to play several times, get all the achievements and buy five times to support the developers. Just didn't think it was bad enough to get thumbs down, and my reasoning as to why is in the review.
Honzas4400 Jul 29, 2019 @ 2:22am 
I'm not taking offense, I'm trying to present my defense. Doesn't mean I'm angry or offended. You come here calling my review something that it's not, the least I can do is say it's not the case and why. Regardless, your opinion is still based on nothing 'tangible', but so be it.

Anyway, yes, the game isn't doing too great. But it isn't doing poorly either. If the game was in any way near the disaster people claim it is, "mixed" wouldn't be the rating you see on Steam. Steam reviews are based around thumbs up and thumbs down; having a large number of either is going to tip the percentage number - a completely different metric - to either side. If a game has 99% thumbs ups, it doesn't mean it's a 10/10 game and vice-versa. "Positive" ranges anywhere between 6-10. And if a game is generally really great but has some flaws, you can't rate it "mixed" or anything like that. You can either recommend it or not. You don't have the choice to choose how much you actually do recommend it
CarnageInc. Jul 28, 2019 @ 6:05pm 
Keyboard warrior? Wow ok. Taking offense to that big bad S word that's being thrown around.
If you're trying to become some sort of reviewer on here or online in general, and you receive free copies from the Publisher, then expect to be called a shill.
My opinion is that you're a shill, for reasons stated above. If you like that or not, I don't care.
The only fact is that the game isn't doing too great in overall reviews.
Honzas4400 Jul 27, 2019 @ 4:35pm 
Meanwhile, you're comparing a literal thumbs up from one guy to an aggregation of user reviews represented by a number. Even though I'm in the minority that has enjoyed the game, I'm not the ONLY one that has left a positive review. And those who did, are, for the most part, in agreement to what I've said in the review. Which you would know, if you weren't ignorant.

The fact that I've got the game for free from the local publisher has nothing to do with how I rate the game. I've no need to appeal to Bethesda. I'm pretty sure "one bought/shill review" isn't exactly something they even remotely care for. Maybe If I was an admin of some multi-millon Steam Curator group, which I'm not.

Anyway, if you think this is a 'shill review', like I said, you do you. Unlike you, though, I prefer to actually think first and get some results, not just trying to be a keyboard warrior (even though you're not doing a good job of it) fighting with made up facts supported by absolutely nothing.
CarnageInc. Jul 27, 2019 @ 1:02pm 
That's the best thing you've said so far.
Keep up the great shilling .
Honzas4400 Jul 27, 2019 @ 11:16am 
You do you, mate. You do you...
CarnageInc. Jul 27, 2019 @ 9:38am 
You received a review copy from the Devs/Publishers and gave it a Positive review, so I'm not reading the rest of your shill review.
But hey, the game is doing great with the Mixed and 47% on Steam.
Karas12 Jul 26, 2019 @ 2:35pm