Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
>Plays for another 5.076 hours
>Refuses to elaborate
>Leaves
I think you're missing the main reason why people are pointing this out, mainly because that the reviewer has 2,181 hours on a game that came out in February a little more than 3 months from now. 2181 hours is 2.9 months, that's pretty much physically impossible for any one person to do and would mean that the reviewer had the game on almost day in and day out for 3 months straight.
That's why people are mentioning the hours.
I honestly trust people with more hours and more words in negative reviews than people that doesn't know how to play and gave negative at the first minute
Your review is fine, and I approve on it! Thanks for trusty words!