Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
But 20 weapons is a lot no? I mean, unless they all do the same thing, same damage, range, etc.
Also I don't get the people's obsession with ultra fast movement like if it was Quake. It only benefits gamepad players with auto-aim.
Whoever reads this, trust your own experience of a game or be at least critical in a healthy way about the opinions of all reviews available. But for the future, trust no specimen like him when it comes to setting the right tones to a game.
When I bought the remake of MW1 i knew it's gonna be trash in the inner, but at least it was what was shown and it had the "Call of Duty" feeling all over. Buying it for 19,79 for campaign and some fun to be had in MP until the cracks and flaws show is a fine compromise, but this game isn't (and probably won't be) worth that steep discount.
They could add or recycle even 100 weapons, it will drag out the fun to be had for sure for some hours, but at the end it keeps being a stale gameplay experience, a huge let down and stagnation of what it was advertised to be. And not once, but at least 4 years in a row, and people won't understand that it keeps getting worse if they accept this behaviour.
There are literally 37 new guns. That's pretty good for a new launch. Older Call of Duty's were launching with less than that even, MWII is just a huge outlier.