Zombies is only good when Treyarch makes it in their own games

the multiplayer is a new game its one of the funnest in years

A quick google search says 35 new guns? And after playing, each map has been remastered with great detail. Oh yeah, 0 hrs on record. You're a tool.

remember when makarov wasnt a scrawny edgelord

MWII was my first COD so I don't have the nostalgia over the maps, and for zombies I would rather play World War Z (which I acquired free on the Epic store and it is great).

But 20 weapons is a lot no? I mean, unless they all do the same thing, same damage, range, etc.

Also I don't get the people's obsession with ultra fast movement like if it was Quake. It only benefits gamepad players with auto-aim.

Everyone who pre-ordered it deserved this and I'm also cool with the people who genuinely enjoy it without trying to shoving their undeveloped opinion to the others. But this guy picks one thing out of the review, says the OP is lying (even tho it changes nothing to the actual reviews intention) and just can't get around his head to actually understand his defending mechanism that triggers just to so he doesn't have to accept himself that he wasted good money and took the god damn L. No, rather he puts out that pile of dirt.

Whoever reads this, trust your own experience of a game or be at least critical in a healthy way about the opinions of all reviews available. But for the future, trust no specimen like him when it comes to setting the right tones to a game.

Fizz-Sama seriously missed the point on tis rather short review (and on the other 70% of reviews to this game it seems). People are not salty because of SBMM (i.e. because they suck), its a legit downfall to the actual campaign and their way to approach making their new games.

When I bought the remake of MW1 i knew it's gonna be trash in the inner, but at least it was what was shown and it had the "Call of Duty" feeling all over. Buying it for 19,79 for campaign and some fun to be had in MP until the cracks and flaws show is a fine compromise, but this game isn't (and probably won't be) worth that steep discount.

They could add or recycle even 100 weapons, it will drag out the fun to be had for sure for some hours, but at the end it keeps being a stale gameplay experience, a huge let down and stagnation of what it was advertised to be. And not once, but at least 4 years in a row, and people won't understand that it keeps getting worse if they accept this behaviour.

I took the time to look around Fizz-sama's links and I dont know what kind of abomination he is. But seems like he got no idea how the old and even the new Call of Duty games actually were and what the comparison is to games being released next to them every year - new, remade or remastered. How much they cost, what they generally deliver, all that. It's not easy to gain the favor of the internet community and thus it's hard if you as a developer (or publisher) wanted your products to be rated "alright" or even "good" or better. Sometimes the hate is unjustfied, but up until now I always found out about it just with the own moral compass (DayZ, No Man Sky or Cyberpunk als being first hand experiences). An then there is Activision or Blizzard and you do not wonder about their actions, but about their "fans" who seriously try to defend these games or the developer/publisher behind this scam with the most mind boggling and twisted "clarifications".

don't forget the terrible unlock system for multiplayer

Me when I lie.

There are literally 37 new guns. That's pretty good for a new launch. Older Call of Duty's were launching with less than that even, MWII is just a huge outlier.