Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I understand what you mean, but I'm curious to see how they pull this off. Pathfinder doesn't have as wide a reach as the Warhammer franchise.
https://warhammer40k.fandom.com/wiki/Inquisitor_(Novel)
Eisenhorn I just got bored with the first novel.
Not saying the Ian Watson was great. I preferred his Space Marine novel. Of course non of that works anymore with the new canon.
Yup, birth of 40K actually.
That's the one.It was a long time back.
Standalone novel or the omnibus?
There's also the Inquisition War.
The inquisition war I kinda linked to...
It is interesting though to see the changes between the original trilogy and the adaptation to the new lore.
huh?
40K Was a reskin of Warhammer, the fantasy version. As in literally just warhammer in space. I mean it is well it's own thing now... but back then it was basically just a reskin. Rouge Trader was 1998 and always had the 40K title, even when it was only in white drawf.... and 40K was 1997 and 1983