Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
https://i.imgur.com/b4zJpYh.jpg
(the library settings in the image are lacking some of the latest settings because those screenshots were taken a long time ago)
There is quite a huge difference between small and large, and I personally prefer medium at the moment.
Small on 1080p display: 12 x 5 = 60 tiles.
Medium: 9 x 4 = 36 tiles.
Large: 6 x 2 or 3 = 12 or 18 depending on if you count only full tiles.
It just seems more logical to have it where it used to be, its not like something has taken its place, its just a blank space now. I like to adjust the thumbnail scale on the fly depending on whether I'm sitting back on the sofa or at the desk, lots of file browsing software's have a thumbnail scale slider or respond to the universal windows command CTRL+MouseWheel-FWD/BK to zoom. Good UI design is all about ease-of-access and in some cases familiarity like with hotkeys. The question is, is 'settings' really the best place for thumbnail scaling?
https://imgur.com/a/KwX5GCW
Now I know what the large setting is for