Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
are these people NUTS?!!
I can understand that letting players and developers get and stay in touch is a noble sentiment, but it has to be something people really want to do mutually, rather than something that's just forced onto people.
The way you make people want something is by:
1. showing them the thing
2. giving them the choice to decline it, and the time to think about the decision.
That will give people the opportunity to update their workflow gradually to take advantage of the new resources available to them.
It won't happen immediately, but you can't force people to like something anyway.
Personally I stopped browsing the store because of these. When I identify a game and I'm ready to buy I do it as quickly as possible. I ain't browsing whilst animations are forced on us.
Like a pushy salesman at a store. Ask once fine but keep going and I'll walk out and go somewhere else. Don't have much choice if game is only on Steam but I don't have to like or pay attention to it. It's search > Store Page > Add > cart > checkout
Yes, they are. And Valve developers support this absurdity.
Me too. Browsing the store with a low bandwidth connection (where i live fiber isn't available) and with a 1360x768 monitor is totally a pain. Valve don't want my money, so i go on others store to purchase games (usually Fanatical).
Keep looking for a way to block animated gifs but no luck so far. Wouldn't be so bad if you could toggle it like the videos
And I have 200mbps and multiple displays so performance and bandwidth isn't the issue. Its the complete lack respect for their customers. It's well known that a proportion or web users block ads, scripts and video from playing. Doesn't matter the reason they do it just that business must force their advertisements.
It's like hey you came to browse our products. Thanks while you here watch this and shove a video in your face. If they did that in the physical world customers would not only leave some would punch there staff in the face.
I designed websites years ago. Old html not all the fancy html that means every site must reload everything when you click to view another page or section or apply a filter. Doesnt' matter if it's cached their is absolutely no need for it to happen. Sure the old days using frames to organise wasn't without it's issues but at least it meant only loading/refresh what was required.
Yeah people have better than dialup and fast system but why suck up all that bandwidth and resources just because you can.
I actually left after multiple arguments over Fancy new looks and what others were doing when I designed for efficiency. They didn't like it so I said fine be selfish and penalise you customers and walked out. Took them 3 weeks to get a replacement. A replacement that had to not only redesign everything I was working on but also had to start updating dozens of other sites too. I heard it took him almost 6 months. and god how ugly and resource hungry they were.
I like to have all my games on a single platform, and Galaxy 2.0 is really terrible :)
The sad part is that Steam is still the better alternative. Not because Steam is better (it isn't anymore) but because the others are far worse.
i've completely stopped coming here with the client. i use small mode with no browser after downloading all my games. i use my linux with ff and add ons to block that bs. just too much
i just don't understand the lack of choice.
Hadn't realised they were getting that big thought and must be nibbling into caps for those that have them.
Ties into part of why I don't like the redesign with dev streams, what's new, community content ect. Lots of wasted data loading up when I just wanted to manage and launch my games. Sort of forces people who don't want to (or cant afford to) do that to use small mode or shortcuts. Thankfully old version still works for now since still find the redesign feels clunky and cluttered layout
Perhaps more importantly, it's probably better to divest yourself from Steam now. The more games you have stuck on Steam, the harder it will be when Steam becomes intolerable to use. At least no matter how much Galaxy sucks you can always kick it to the curb.
I have a folder on my desktop and pinned to quick access called Steam Games. All my installed games have shortcuts in that folder. I haven't launched a game using the client since the changes. Unless changes and or with options come in I'll stick to shortcuts.......I suspect that will be the case.
I've tried playnite and don't like it. It's still a bloated javascript application build over a chromium framework At least is better coded than the new Steam library
I wonder why every programmer nowaday want to use a so heavy, slow and sub-optimal script language as javascript for interfaces, instead of a proper programming language.