Does it stand test of time?

I had seen too much nonsense in games industry. I'm sick and tired how people often fail to give proper reviews of titles. They are either uncritical, write memes or just describe the game rather than making an actual review of it. I'm writing reviews for myself, because there was nobody like me to tell if a game I would play is worth my time or not. I do what I do out of idealism.

My reviews have a single purpose, to determine if a game is worthy to be played. I do this not only by judging how fun it is to play, but also think about its peers and what standards industry had established. I will not recommend an inferior product merely because of nostalgia. I will go, play a game and judge it based by standards applied today. If game from a decade ago sucks, I will say so and won't let nostalgia to cloud my eyes. If a game is good, but some parts are so bad that I'm unable to recommend it, I will say it in a review that a game is good and will emphasise its weaknesses.

I focus on technical aspects of a game, not only if it runs well, but also how design of in game mechanics works out. Does this game have deep bugs which ruins your playtrough halfway in? Is it user interface and playability acceptable? Do developers deliver on what they had promised in their adverts? I try to tackle difficult questions and give a detailed critique about games which rarely anyone else do.