Kết quả tìm kiếm

Hiển thị 1-10 trong 294,125,785 mục
Trong diễn đàn "Steam Community"
13
Never purchasing on Steam again
Vừa xong
Amber Baal
Trong diễn đàn "Anvil Empires Thảo luận chung"
35
2
Combat needs work
Vừa xong
CommandoKal
14
Due to secure boot bs I will be skipping this one.
Vừa xong
Motionist
Trong diễn đàn "Limbus Company Thảo luận chung"
2
2
When did the pull rate got nerfed so bad?
Vừa xong
Om3ga-Z3ro
Trong diễn đàn "Subnautica 2 Thảo luận chung"
74
1
Krafton responds to lawsuit with court filing
Vừa xong
SzargontheCultured
Nguyên văn bởi StimJunky:
Nguyên văn bởi リアンダ:
Disclaimer: Opinion

No judge will ever rule on this case. They will settle behind closed doors as 19/20 civil cases tend to do. Both parties have done too much shady stuff to score a flawless victory. It's the kind of messy situation you don't want to fight out in a public court.

Krafton seems to be genuinely dissapointed in the UWE leadership and afraid for the viablity of the franchise moving forward under their leadership. Krafton have already invested too much money and recevied almost nothing in return. They will need to sell spinoffs and DLCs and maybe another sequel just to break even. Since they consider the former execs rogue elements at best and liabilities at worst they will fight tooth and nail to prevent the former execs from coming back. Even if that means throwing cash at Charlie who probably has a good chance of getting more than 50% of what he's asking for, moneywise.

For the public (that's us) the final result will be. Setllement, undisclosed amoun of money. No admittance of guilt from either party. Kraftons remains in full control of UWE. SN2 will not be affected too much by the lawsuit if the quality is equal or better than Below Zero.

None of that makes any logical sense. Krafton weren't willing to pay a contractually obligated performance bonus IF UWE met the revenue targets. So, rather than let UWE release the the game, which Krafton claims is too under baked to be successful, and thus would miss the revenue targets triggering the earnout they instead decide fired them, cause a ton of drama and reputation harm, and get sued, and incur legal fees all just so that they can then throw money at the very same people to make them go away?
dude thats just your opinion
Trong diễn đàn "Once Human Thảo luận chung"
33
A 40gb update?
Vừa xong
Bober
2
Do everdark Libra on solo
Vừa xong
Lukas
0
Constant crashing on 5090 / 9800x3D
Vừa xong
kammikazy
Trong diễn đàn "OUTBRK Bug Reports"
0
Test Bug Report
Vừa xong
WalkOverYou
31
Do all of you just play fiendsmith or something?
Vừa xong
Zephyr
Nguyên văn bởi Apollo:
Nguyên văn bởi Zephyr:
Maliss slop complaining about Fiendsmith slop? Now that's comedy.
Maliss is just a fun deck with a lot of ways to play it, alongside being very powerful, but im not putting Maliss in every deck I make like fiendsmith players do. Thats my point - I dont see how nobody else gets tired of seeing Fiendsmith + Whatever

Maliss is one archetype in one deck - fiendsmith is in every deck that isnt Blue Eyes or Maliss
I'm sure Apo turbo is very fun and completely unique.
Nguyên văn bởi Apollo:
Nguyên văn bởi Lasagna:
Maliss player complaining lol
At least Maliss takes some skill in order to win - you cant just summon cards back and forth and guarantee a win like most people think who’ve never played it. It looks like that but in reality a lot of times you have to go a-roundabout way to get what you need on the field unless you open with Dormouse but usually that gets negated. Even after learning the main combo you realize you can play the deck in some very creative ways.
If this is a joke I can safely say you got me, if it isn't dear lord.

Maliss is just generic link slop, it's only """creative""" in regards to what busted generic link monsters you're bringing out.
Fiendsmith however is the same linear format and it’s in every deck.

So yes I’ll complain, because it’s boring playing the same deck. fiendsmith ryzeal, fiendsmith terlaments, fiendsmith tempai, fiendsmith pureleyy, fiendsmith Horus, ect ect

If it’s not Maliss or Blue Eyes it’s usually some fiendsmith variant. I don’t mind it in memento, it makes sense there. But a fiendsmith penguin deck? Please.
I don't disagree with your take of Fiendsmith, it's a garbage archetype people throw into their deck as a dumb band aid fix cause making an actual deck is too hard for em. I just think it's funny seeing a cancer deck complaining about another cancer deck, literally it's the pot calling the kettle black.

I could understand if you were playing a rogue deck or even maybe something like Tenpai now that they've seemingly neutered that deck, but Maliss? Seriously? Lmao.
Hiển thị 1-10 trong 294,125,785 mục