ผลลัพธ์การค้นหา

Have you tried praying?

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย chrisbamb:

As stated to another poster, let me know when your game is out and I hope it's perfect. At least he's trying and I bet his trying is 10 times better than anything you have ever done.

I agree he is trying, trying peoples patience. Are you sure it is 10 times better and not 9.21 or even 9.64 times better? 10 times just seems like an exaggeration but as we don't know each other perhaps you are just rounding for sake of argument.

I dont think the combat style of this game would fit a BR mode since this games combat style is more fast paced run and gun and not every shooter game needs a BR

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Houseman:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย NoRain :( 🗕 🗗 🗙:

This is largely projection, as you're presuming that you -- the other person -- are actually providing *VALID* evidence which states the opposite. You do not; you specifically engage with fallacious reasoning and baseless accusations

See? This is why we can't unite.

This is a breakdown of communication.
It would be one thing if you said "You're wrong, and here's why". That would actually be a proper discussion. We could continue to go back and forth defending our arguments. That's how debate works. But you don't do that.

It's as if you're saying that my arguments are so wrong that they are not even worthy of counter-argument. You just "name-call" them as fallacious and baseless without demonstrating how.

That's not proper arguing. You can certainly accuse others of committing fallacies, as I did to you, and for having no basis for their claims, but you actually have to explain why and how (like I did). That's the part you don't do.

For example, in the linked thread:
1. I argued that "wealth isn't distributed"
2. You brought up a statistic that you thought supported your argument: tax cuts, deregulation, and stock buybacks.
3. I argued that these things were not examples of wealth being distributed, these are things that make it easier to accumulate wealth.
4. You then argued that "Tax cuts are literally wealth distribution"
5. I pointed out how this was just a claim, not an argument, and asked for you to present an argument for why you think so.
6. You refused.

So, given that exchange, which one of us is being unreasonable? Which one of us caused the breakdown in communication?

Didn't you get banned for openly admitting you were just trying to rage-bait to get people banned by spam reporting?

No, the post that Steam took action on, and considered to be "insulting, rude, or harassment" was the one where I accused you of using an LLM.

I find it sad that you have such a delusional view of how that thread and our conversations prior transpired

As it stands, I have no interest speaking with you because of your continued bad-faith engagements. You have a bad reputation, and whether or not you think its justified does little to the commonplace reception of your posts. Maybe you'll be better in the future, but unfortunately, I don't think that's going to be for me to know. I'm going to block you now, and I sincerely hope you better yourself going forward

Yes

lol ye.
which is also weird considering Ys 1 is also a bundle of 2 different versions. meaning its been remade.... seems like they could have combined the 2...

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Gammy:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย 𝓁 λ 𝓂 𝒷 𝒹 𝒶🌴:

Which one?

Wdym? Practically all forms of fun is a sin.

No way man! There's plenty of wholesome fun to be had without hurting yourself and others with sin.

patch notes where?

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Gammy:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย NEET:

Virtue is a middle between less and more. Because this pride is no a virtue but a vice.

Now explain which state is more adventageous to your own life, pride or virtue?

Virtue, because is more safe than pride, in any situations, is loke has you head on local to undestand and do some thing.