Sökresultat

Ursprungligen skrivet av 林:

I don’t have expertise in these areas—I’m just sharing solutions I found through searching to offer some help. If you have other needs or specific requests, feel free to look for solutions on your own. I’m merely providing a potential fix for this issue based on the current situation.

was directing my frustrations at valve, not you

Ursprungligen skrivet av Amycat:

Ten days from whenever you last looted it.

No. Every 10 days. If you loot on day 10, on day 11 it all respawns.
The first time loot respawns on day 11. Then every 10 days after that.

Ursprungligen skrivet av v^v^v^v^√\/:

Ursprungligen skrivet av OUberLord:

Except BF2042, BF6, BO7, possibly BO6 after an upcoming patch, and any other game that wants to leverage Secure Boot as part of their anti-cheat technology.

BF2042 works without secure boot if you have MBR.
I still play it.
They removed this ability from BF6 though. So while I can play 2042, I can't play BF6.
BO7, Bo6? I guess that is Call of Duty? Not interested in this garbage.

Fair enough.

Best of luck man!

Okay thank for your stupidity.

Do you ever tried tabulator + alternate keys?
So that you can switch your focused window/programm?

The support-button and the bugreport-button will open a new window implemented by the Unreal Engine.

Ursprungligen skrivet av morrisonjake05:

its beta omg mate

If you think theyre going to make significant gameplay changes to the game at this point.....well then, ive got a dream to sell you

Ursprungligen skrivet av Jamma003:

Ursprungligen skrivet av Alive!:

"This is starting to feel like moving goalposts."

Where's the goalpost move? Specifically where? You quoted a few things said be me (and some others), but you restructured my words into your own words, which is its own form of goalpost moving, in addition to gaslighting. Just so you know, when you quote someone, it's supposed to be what they said verbatim, not your own interpretation of what they said translated into how you wanted to hear it. Digressing from that, the definition of a goalpost move is to change the rules, requirements, or criteria of a situation. Where did I ever do that? By simply giving you the truth about what the majority thought? Then opening up an avenue of possibility for your suggestion to be somewhat feasible? Not a goalpost move dude, so if that's directed at me, I simply reject the notion. It seems to me what this may be about under the surface for you is that a drove of legacy players aren't rallying behind something that was largely unpopular.

I really cannot be bothered with this any more, so heres an AI generated summary of your actual quotes and why, even if I paraphrase them, the meaning is the same:

1. “They actually changed the Green Knight so that he wouldn't be broken anymore. Most players… considered him to be the worst knight in the game due to how poorly his back-flip contributed to air combos.”
– Here you frame the issue as the backflip being ineffective in combos.

2. “A damage buff… would have been doing more damage, but he still would have been clunky feeling, which was the main issue.”
– Now the main issue isn’t about combo viability, but the feel of the move.

3. “If the Green Knight's old back flip is re-implemented as an alt play-style uniquely for him, then players maining the other Knights will want the same treatment.”
– This changes again — now it’s about fairness to other characters, not viability or feel.

4. “The only way… would be if the Green Knight's back flip were usable for all characters… but [it] was largely unpopular.”
– Now the reason not to reintroduce it is because it was unpopular, despite earlier saying giving it to everyone was the only fair way to add it back.

5. “It seems to me what this may be about… is that a drove of legacy players aren't rallying behind something that was largely unpopular.”
– And now we’ve shifted again — this time to majority opinion being the deciding factor on whether something belongs in the game at all, regardless of legacy or unique gameplay value.

Im unsubscribing from this thread now since we are kinda derailing it.

When you're resorting to A.I. in order to have discourse with somebody, the discourse is no longer your own. Interestingly enough, the A.I. didn't get it right either. I'm not gonna go over every detail, but one of the critical points that it got wrong is this:

3. “If the Green Knight's old back flip is re-implemented as an alt play-style uniquely for him, then players maining the other Knights will want the same treatment.”
– This changes again — now it’s about fairness to other characters, not viability or feel.

The A.I. claims that this was "changed." It wasn't. It's simply stating that those two things can exist at the same time. Not only that, but it's relating to fairness to "characters" which doesn't even make sense being that the characters are fictional. My point specifically talked about OTHER PLAYERS; quote " when players maining the other Knights will want the same treatment." You can try to make the argument that it means the exact same thing (it doesn't) but the overall point here is that the A.I. is flawed, and not a replacement for discourse.

As a side note, I'm noticing in Steam threads that people rely far too much on A.I. do their heavy lifting, and when the A.I. gets things right, the user wants to stand behind it and accept credit, but when the A.I. gets things wrong (like it just did) people generally want to distance themselves from being responsible for what was said, which in my opinion is complete BS. Using A.I. to replace your own voice is not discourse.

I'm going to stay subbed because this topic interests me, but I'll leave this comment for when you come lurking back on here.

Ursprungligen skrivet av Rikuto01:

You're thinking too hard about this. Just shoot robots.

Do you know what’s the scariest thing in the world?
It’s incompetent teammates who don’t even know their roles or understand the game, yet just blindly throw themselves into it

Ursprungligen skrivet av TheHaluzer Official™:

Ursprungligen skrivet av NUKLEAR-SLUG:

Are your roboports within range of each other? They need to be close enough so that the yellow marked areas touch and the dotted connection line shows.

If they are too far apart then they count as seperate networks so the 1000 construction bots will not be able to find the solar panels because they are in the other networks logistic storage pool.

Do an experiment. Put down a single roboport, fill it with construction bots and then put a yellow chest with solar panels next to it and then see if the bots will build things nearby.

they touch eachother.
They dont build

Do the roboports have stippled lines between them? You should be able to see it when you hold a roboport in your cursor.

disable wifi before starting the game, then delete your save in local folder documents/Ghost Games, and after racer/cops tutorial, turn it on, that forces it to create a new one

I see that there's an option to toggle music, but how to turn off the sound effects? Trying to play this game in the background while doing other things, but the sound effects are still going on. Is there really not an option for this? No one wanted this after all these years?