Результаты поиска

Игра не запускает на сервер. В режиме оффлайн тоже не работает...

Автор сообщения: Dead Miside

Автор сообщения: Kozzy

It is WAY better now, Medics are much more useful now. Stay by your medics

Sorry, our medic ran out of darts, so he is not a medic anymore.

how much are you getting hit exacty lmfao

can't play 2 days in a row thanks EA

Автор сообщения: Ray Von

Don't worry guys since EA are enforcing SecureBoot as a requirement on BF6 then rest assured Crytek will jump onboard and implement this advance in super technology like they did with AVX2. I've always had SecureBoot enabled since I got my customized Win 11 Enterprise installed so no biggie.

To be honest the free EAC works well enough for me but I play US East before the invasion of the servers occur around 10pm my time, that I've been told.

yeah crytek/easy anticheat are too good at fighting cheaters for there to be any in hunt so...

特地实验了一下，发现重启一下电脑后又需要开VNP，如果不关电脑进入一次后就可以不开VNP了

Balloons are broken

Автор сообщения: SHIBITO BRAIN

Of course original analogy you friend fed to AI has only 1 hardship level. See I said him "You gave AI only 1 my quote but forgot to add my explanation on that point." If you read my previous posts you can find that explanation:

Автор сообщения: SHIBITO BRAIN

Devs only did a game with different challenge options. Who forced me to buy a game? Who forced me to pick hard? Who forced me to play before bed? Nobody but myself. Devs don't hold responsibility for the fact I forced hard conditions on myself and slider seduced me under this conditions.

But your friend ignored it several times then "forgot" to give AI this info then AI of course gave 1 hardship level analogy and your friend presented it as evidence to frame me.
But if you actually apply my explanation hardship level becomes like it is in reality:
I bought the game knowing full well it has sliders (I paid for a meal that includes a cake) ->
I picked hard to play it (I tried to eat a meal without eating a cake) ->
I played for a while into the late night stuck on one boss (I've been on a diet for a while).

Okay, but my point is that your interpretation makes you look worse than the original one. Now, in your version, it's entirely on you that you fell to temptation due to lack of self control. Also in your version it is no longer a "hardship level" because instead of it being something that happened to you and you had to respond, now the entire incident is something you caused of your own volition. You were the architect of your own destruction (hyperbole, but I couldn't resist using the Prince of Persia quote here so indulge me a bit).

Автор сообщения: SHIBITO BRAIN

If you really wanna know my answers to those issues you can reread my post history. I'm not blaming you didn't read all those walls of text before, just don't feel like wasting time on that again. So if you REALLY wanna know, well, sorry but waste your time reading it yourself.

The reason I am specifically asking those questions is because i read through the discussion and didn't see an answer to those. If I missed your response to that feel free to point me in the right direction. This is one of my main points in my post so I would really like it addressed in some fashion.

Автор сообщения: SHIBITO BRAIN

Ok

Glad we agree and are able to find at least some common ground.

Автор сообщения: SHIBITO BRAIN

I understood the question. I answered it in the first sentence "it can't affect". After that sentence I immediately proceeded to talk about something else what really mattered in my opinion. Your friend even accused me I talked about smth else, and thats correct, because I was.

Right and that, along with claiming your opinion on what mattered was fact (you didn't say it in so many words, but that is how your tone came across), combined with being so dismissive is exactly what caused the issue in the first place.

Автор сообщения: SHIBITO BRAIN

So we have a discussion whether to add/not add sliders. What will ideally determine whether the game will get/not get sliders? How many people want/don't want add them.

So my "question which really matters" is "how many Joes demand sliders".

And what is your reasoning for why that is the question that matters?

Автор сообщения: SHIBITO BRAIN

Question "what if one Joe is playing and touches a slider" can be asked about what game? About where there is a slider already. Does it matter if "Joe is playing"? No. (Thats the answer to the question. "No"). Will this discussion matter when the game already has sliders? No, they are already there.

This is the crux of the misunderstanding you are having from my point of view. We are talking about a hypothetical, it doesn't need to be something that already exists. In this case, I believe the discussion was about a hypothetical difficulty slider in Wuchang specifically (and single player soulslikes in general to some degree). It was not about discussing games that already have sliders but about how it would affect Wuchang itself were it to be implmented.

Автор сообщения: SHIBITO BRAIN

So my idea I wanted to explain is: at the time of this discussion there are no sliders hence no Joes can play now.

I am not sure what you mean by this. Are you using Joes to represent a specific type of player? Originally the term was being used to name some random other person of no particular attribute, not a specific type of player. Please clarify.

Автор сообщения: SHIBITO BRAIN

When the game will get sliders there will be no point in discussion because sliders will be already there.

Right but it hasn't happened yet so the discussion is about how it could change the game. There is no need to jump ahead that far in this discussion is there?

Автор сообщения: SHIBITO BRAIN

Where this discussion will be shifted to at this time? To some potential game without sliders.

Why do you assume this will be the case? And your entire argument seems to presume such a discussion, should it happen as you say, is automatically a bad thing. Which goes back to my main point. Why is that a bad thing?

Автор сообщения: SHIBITO BRAIN

And what will matter at this hypothetical point in time in the future? Again how many joes vote for this or for that.

What is important to this discussion is the changes in this game specifically. You don't need to jump ahead because each game will be a different situation and a different discussion at that point.

Автор сообщения: SHIBITO BRAIN

In my post I talked about 3 different questions about individual level : "what if one Joe is playing", "do you care what some nobody person X you don't know and who is outside your reach is doing right now" and "what if one Joe demands a slider".

But I talked only about 2 questions about macro level: "do you care what every single person in the world is doing right now?" and "what if many Joes demand a slider".

AI said "responder answers "It can't affect" (meaning "what if one Joe is playing" doesn't affect). Then contradicts that by saying: "What matters is the macro level. What if everyone does it?""

But the macro level to "what if one Joe is playing" is "what if every Joe is playing". You see I didn't talk about that macro level at all. I talked about 2 other macro levels: "do you care what every single person in the world is doing right now?" and "what if many Joes demand a slider". So I didn't contradict what I said, because I switched to another topic immediately after answering original question.

I don't want to get lost in the weeds on semantics here so let me reframe it a bit.

From what i understood from your posts in this topic, you specifically mentioned to paraphrase your point a bit, that someone else using difficulty sliders does not affect you, unless everyone is doing the same thing, in which case you may be affected in some way, And the reason you don't want difficulty sliders is because you may fall to the temptation of lowering the difficulty for yourself in a moment of weakness, ruining the intended experience (assuming the hardest setting is the intended one), because of your admitted lack of self control. Does that about sum it up? If so, the point I am saying about that is that ultimately boils down to a "you" problem and should not affect the devs making game design choices that would benefit the entire playerbase. The devs have stated in interviews linked in this topic that they want this to be a more approachable soulslike so a difficulty slider makes sense to allow everyone to find tune the difficulty to their own skill level. If they didn't use a difficulty slider in a soulslike intended to be more approachable, then they would have to resort to nerfs, which would water down the experience for everyone. If you personally can't help but lower it, then maybe you don't enjoy difficulty as much as you think you do?

If you feel I misrepresented your argument, feel free to correct me and we can discuss your intended stance on the issue further.

Tanks are fine. People need to stop sitting there in the open getting pelted on their side/top/rear armor.

Автор сообщения: Ares

Автор сообщения: tayotte14

why have secure boot if its not detecting as soon as they get into the loading screen of the game anyone who is for secure boot is brainwashed

Who said secure boot will stop cheaters from cheating? It only documents it and records the punishment. You have to imagine it like a crime: the perpetrator isn't deterred from committing the crime, but they will be found, convicted, and punished more quickly based on evidence analysis. TPM 2.0 has only been mandatory on newer systems since 2020, and Battlefield is only the first game that requires it to play.

wait secure boot isnt to even stop the cheaters......

Hi, most use the Mods in the Modular Encounters Collection made by Meridius_IX / Lucas

Modular Encounters Collection
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=888460730



_____________

Question :

Have you already found the solutionS against all new Vanilla enemies they added ?

There are a minimum of 3 Combat Strategy to find in-game today :

1 - Warship or small Fighter able to win the battle against the enemy SPRT stations having Drone spawners on all planets and moons from premade worlds in Original Content Category.

2 - Warship solution able to complete "Escort Contract" at Trade stations, that is from the option named "Economy".

3 - Warship able to conquer and recover the endgame blocks so Prototech Blocks from Factorum Faction stations to build High Tech ships and stations.



- NEW - Global Encounter Cap = Enemy Factorum stations in space only.

- Encounter amount = Space and can be setup on creating a new world only.

- NEW - Random encounters = Space only

- Enable Drones = Space only.

- NEW - Enable planetary encounters = All planets and moons.

- NEW - Cargo ship = Adds Cargo ships bond to Trade stations and we can loot those ship in space.

- Economy = That adds Trade stations with contracts we can do for them and gain reputation points, they also have different stores where we can buy and sell.

- The animals count slider and Wolves/Spiders ON/OFF = Wolves on Earth, Spiders on Pertam, Alien and Titan.