Rezultatele căutării

Se afișează 1-10 din 294,070,932 intrări
În forumul „SMITE 2 Discuții generale
10
Real refunds please
Chiar acum
ILovePlayAssist
11
Well well well
Chiar acum
Krush
În forumul „Off Topic
25
1
Hello, I’m from Ukraine.
Chiar acum
WarHeRo
267
36
Risk of Rain: The Board Game
Chiar acum
Viandante
35
Krafton responds to lawsuit with court filing
8
Forgotten Lagoon B1 puzzles
Chiar acum
Malkav0
Postat inițial de Cregan:
For the first one: make sure you travel in the right fashion.
This doesn't really cut it, as the "fashion" isn't indicated in anyway. Not your fault of course, this is, in my opinion, very badly designed, as are - unfortunately - a bunch of the things that were added with the Mystery Update.
I traveled the locations, once by bird and portals when no bird available, and once by portal whenever available. Nothing happened.
Thus it went past the point of being interesting and down to the point being frustrating and with no room for further comprehension except testing, long uninteresting testing.

So let's be clear, starting top left, the big icy island symbol, immediately to its right is a bird, which I assume is the Beast Island, because the symbol after that is a whirlpool so I won't fly into a whirlpool, right...
Exiting Beast Island, there's a whirlpool right there, which is fitting since it leads right in front of the big fire island, the next symbol.
Next destination is the big stone island, I tried going there both by bird and portal.
Then it's a whirlpool and the big water island, which means I'd have to exit the big stone island by the right side to take the whirlpool below, leading me to the side of the big water island.
Next symbol is Lost Landing, I can only go there through portal so here we go.
Next is a whirlpool, great, since there's one immediately to the right.
Final symbol is a triangle with a line under it, which I can only assume is the Forgotten Lagoon because it doesn't fit any other types of island either by the "map" in Snake Island or by other references used for deduction before in the game.

And all that does nothing. So, could you tell me where it's wrong and more importantly, why ? Meaning, how was I supposed to reach another solution with just what the game provided me ?
În forumul „Crush Crush Discuții generale
32
If they were to add a new girl via phone flings or an event, who would you like to imagine them as being? What kind of relationship might they have to the existing girls?
Chiar acum
Quake Master
1
Jank
Chiar acum
LuckyCheshire
În forumul „SMITE 2 Discuții generale
10
Real refunds please
Chiar acum
ILovePlayAssist
În forumul „Off Topic
77
The 10 Commandments are in Texas classrooms now.
Chiar acum
Tonepoet
Postat inițial de Joe Cool:
I don't understand what the issue is?

Is there anything in the 10 commandments that is actually bad?

Lets say it had nothing to do with any specific religion, and was just presented as a list of 10 things that you shouldn't do if you want to be a good person.

Would it still be a bad thing to have in schools?

The 10 commandments aren't actually linked to one specific religion. It's connected to multiple religions. Some of the complainants against the Louisiana law are Jews and Catholics[lailluminator.com] because they object to a Protestant version of the commandments mismatched to their own being used.

The establishment clause of the first amendment bars laws from establishing religion generally, not just specific religions, and it's not just a list of 10 generically good things. Many of the commandments regard how to worship God which is inherently religious in nature.

Plus if you're asking if there is anything bad in the 10 commandments, they do refer to God as a jealous god, and jealousy generally is not considered a virtue. To the contrary, even within Christianity, envy is considered as one of the seven deadly sins listed by Pope Gregory and the commandments themselves have a provision against coveting. What does God of all beings have to be jealous about anyway?


If you want a generic guide on how to be a good person then the noble Eightfold path from Buddhism fits the bill more closely: Here is how they appear in Religious Systems of the World: A Contribution to the Study of Comparative Religion[www.google.com], in the section on Buddha and Buddhism written by Mrs. Fredrika Macdonald:

  1. Right Views (free from superstition or delusion_
  2. Right Aims (worthy of the intelligent man)
  3. Right Speech (kindly, open, truthful)
  4. Right Conduct (Peaceful, honest, pure)
  5. Right Livelihood (bringing hurt and danger to no living thing
  6. Right Effort (self-control)
  7. Right Mindfulness (the active watchful mind)
  8. Right Contemplation (on the deep mysteries of life)

The parenthetical are her own commentary to elucidate the gist of them in a less ambiguous manner. Nothing about there being a God or having only one God, or keeping the Sabbath holy. et cetera. Much closer to the criteria you listed. Just generally good advice for anyone to follow.

Even so, part of the problem is that it is in connection with a particular religion and with that comes an implicit underlying message of pushing one's religious values upon others.

Apparently the governor of Louisiana thinks Thomas Crooks wouldn't have shot at Trump had there been a display of the ten commandments in his classroom[lailluminator.com].

Postat inițial de Houseman:
It's weird how people can violate the constitution by implementing unconstitutional laws, but not get punished for it.

No penalties for violating the constitution exist within the text of the constitution, plus part of the design intention of the document is for each co-equal branch of government to independently uphold it

Since the branches of government are co-equal, they don't exactly have the authority to penalize one another beyond what is prescribed in the constitution, which are mostly impeachment provisions to remove somebody from office. However, of course, removing somebody from office is made difficult so the power isn't abused.

Given that supreme court justices and presidents have never been removed from office in the 250 year history of the nation, maybe it was made a bit too hard.

But also when you read Act No. 676, the Louisiana legislature at least put a show on deferring to the court by citing Orden v. Perry[legis.la.gov], although Orden v. Perry regarded the construction of a 10 amendments monument out in the open[en.wikipedia.org].

That's similar in some respects, but the Supreme Court already ruled directly on the issue of mandating the display of the 10 commandments in classrooms in Stone v. Graham and ruled against the state of Kentucky in 1980[www.britannica.com]

Postat inițial de Weehawky - nWo 4LIFE:
What about the rest? Cell , DEI, etc

Sorry for not addressing this sooner. I remembered seeing a Law by Mike video on cell phones in school, but I couldn't find the specific one I wanted to reference. I saw others, but not that specific one. Given that teachers have the authority to temporarily confiscate your phones though, and there is no constitutional provision barring it, then yes, a cell phone ban will likely be upheld. D.E.I. is a bit trickier but I reckon it is within state authority to set the classroom curriculum. I doubt prayer time is going through though.
Se afișează 1-10 din 294,070,932 intrări