Resultados da pesquisa

You can tell the information I give is factual when people have to resort to attacking me instead of the argument being made because they know there's nothing they can prove wrong. :)

If y'all spent half as much time critiquing the company as you do defending it, you might have a game worth playing.

People still use Nintendo...epic fail

Originalmente postado por Candyy ♡:

I think it was obvious but it is nice to have oficial confirmación with this stuff I guess 🤔

Who's the princess's prince then? she just has her friend saving her time and time again... where her man at?

Dutchess having a staff i can understand, but why seals? they don't have good faith scaling for them.

$99 here hard pass

war mate a focking war happens , but do not worry they are not abandoning the game .. the best is yet to come

https://anzej.bandcamp.com/album/tainted-grail-the-fall-of-avalon-original-soundtrack

What is not being factored here is the positive effect of Jagex. Mostly because we don't know, but I can assume the brotherly patriotic Croatian spirit had to have some humble pie due to financial concerns and if Jagex didn't step in, we may not have SCUM at all. So if this is an accurate assessment, then we all owe Jagex a big thank you. And to expand on that assessment that would give them credible sway over game production if they chose to do so. The game where it is, is awesome. Like any game though there are endless improvements that could better the game from all player perspectives, but for what can be done for a business expense to returning the investment, that we cannot see as the amounts are never shared.

For that, it is a severely antiquated business ethic. Outdated theory can be updated and experience greater return than can be understood. Hypothesize this with me for a moment. Imagine a more transparent method. In 2022 Jagex purchases Gamepires for the equivalent of 500k. I have no idea what the value truly was, but lest say it was that. Most business ventures hope to get a steady ROI of 5-10%, so that would mean by 2032 the game needs to generate about 550k-600k over the cost of running costs. Again, no idea on how they structured their business or what they are paying for office space, utilities, servers, employees ads etc. Lets factor all that at 300k/year again, no idea and I'm not taking the time to resource it. 300k over 10 years is clearly 3M, ad that to the 550-600k so we'll call it an even 3.5M.

Post that crap! Show what the income stream is and watch as your true supporting players assist more with your dinky DLCs to keep the game going. That is the way of things these days. Crowd sourcing and funding is something as mainstream these days as online dating. These numbers may be way off, either higher or lower, this isn't my gig, but I feel that for a game as old as SCUM is, if innovation means anything to you, you first need to start with transparency driven motivation, if the other method isn't working.

Now you could say maybe it is working. It's possible, though it doesn't seem to be the case with additional staffing reductions, department realignments, update vagueness. Again, let me point out I still love the game and hope it makes it to 2.0 at least, but I feel with a second round table of non-working business heads trying to think this out like a cackle of witches stirring a cauldron waiting for divine enlightenment, I feel it won't make it much beyond 2026. Which makes me sad because it has the roots to flourish.

I'm trying to be a good new-station-owner, really I am.

But this message KEEPS APPEARING on in the station's Logical View on storage bins when there's no apparent reason for it.

AND the game doesn't have any way to determine WHY the message appears - or does it? Is there a secret key-control I'm unaware of which gives a data-filled pop-over to the (!) icon??

Now... I admit that the game does have some delays in working the signals through their systems: I have seen a couple times when I brought a new feeder production module online and it took the game a minute to calculate everything forward and remove those warnings.

BUT.

Right now I'm looking at the Plasma Conductors' (storage) rectangle where it has that WARNING. The storage is currently empty because I keep using all of them it produces.

Looking back 1 step at the Plasma Conductor's (production) ovoid, there's no warning, no red, not even any yellow, no extra notes.

The only thing which might be related is a "Time until resources are depleted:" of over 1hr away. No colors, just plain text.

If I look up another level at the 3 feeders' storages, they all list that they have more coming in than going out.

Looking foward from Plasma Conductors' storage, there are 2 production modules I haven't built yet - but surely those non-existing items can't cause a warning in a prior storage... right?

What am I missing? How does this make sense as part of the UI??

Thanks!

i don't really even know exactly why i feel that way, but the combat is just not clicking with me, and the exploration is exhausting. everywhere you go theres branching path on branching path of samey looking environments with no map