Resultados da pesquisa

Originalmente postado por HoBahr:

Dear Hangar 10 Team,

I'm currently playing your game on an RTX 4090 connected to a 65" OLED TV, running at 4K with maximum settings and DLSS set to Quality mode.

Even from a distance of several meters, I'm noticing severe ghosting artifacts around moving characters. The intensity of these artifacts is quite striking and unlike anything I’ve encountered in other Unreal Engine 5 titles. Notably, this issue appears to affect only character rendering—other geometry in the scene remains unaffected.

It would be greatly appreciated if your team could investigate this, as the ghosting is quite distracting and detracts from an otherwise visually impressive experience.

Best regards,
Holger

Try disabling "motion blur" and set AA/Upscaler to "TSR" and quality to "Native". Worked for me.

Banger soundtrack!

Originalmente postado por Tito Shivan:

Originalmente postado por Ulfrinn:

OP assumes that stuff happens to others for the reasons he's been told. But you're not going to find any actual evidence backing it. It's the power of suggestion based on years of fearmongering and disinformation perpetuated for the sole purpose of creating division. Drop the "white savior" BS. The only ones treating anybody differently based on their skin color, is those types.

And that's a manual example of gaslighting. As little as I like the term.

Do you say this whenever someone calls out these BS narratives? Is it gaslighting as well to point out the same party pushing racial division today is the same one that did it in the 50's?

While ive enjoyed my time with the beta, ive also sorta not at the same time. It doesnt really truly feel like Battlefield, and ill get to why. There are many things i like and dislike but ill keep each list at my top 3 for each.

What I like:
1. The gunplay feels pretty crisp and there is a solid foundation to build off of with only minor tweaks needed.
2. The atmosphere is gritty, realistic and war torn. You can visibly sense the conflict taking place.
3. The classes have their own unique advantages and disadvantages for the most part that if played as a member of a competent squad each class can effect a squads success.

What I dislike:
1. The maps are way to small and restrictive (from what we can play so far) and they dont feel like Battlefield maps. Honestly the maps feel like slightly larger COD maps because they all have the lane system that COD has, just with slightly more smaller routes linking them together. The scale of the maps is lacking that every other Battlefield game offers.
2. The spawn system is not very good. Often when im respawning at an objective it feels like i always respawn in front of a whole enemy squad or just enemy players in general, this often leads to about 40% of my deaths in a match.
3. Because of the smaller map design most of the engagements with the enemy team dont feel natural or like a Battlefield engagement. It feels like when you were a kid playing with action figures and they were fighting, you were just slamming the action figures together back and fourth. Most of the time ive observed that entire teams will be fighting to get through a single lane, choke point or door way. Entire teams will be on opposite sides of a door way or choke point lobbing 32 nades through it and trying to brute force it and run through it while getting gunned down by the entire other team completely throwing any team play out the window.

In summary, ive enjoyed playing the game even though it doesnt really feel like Battlefield to me thus far. The foundation for a great game is here and the devs can seize this opportunity to give us those Battlefield moments ive enjoyed dating clear back to Battlefield 1942. The biggest thing holding this game back for me personally is just how small the maps feel. It doesnt feel like a sandbox of war, it feels like a theme park with the the tools from the sandbox thrown in.

You basically have to treat them like turrets on legs and place them in the right spot to cover angles. Otherwise they'll be content to just stare at the corner while some crackhead puts a bunch of holes in their back.
Also sometimes you'll have to order them to hold position in the middle of a room clearing otherwise they'll continue to flow into other rooms while you need them to cover angles or they make a beeline for evidence and get shot blindly wandering around a corner.
You really have to micromanage tf out of them and while it wasn't so frustrating for me since I like to play slow and methodical I definitely understand why so many people are fed up with the teammate AI.

I have no problem with 100% refund for an apocalypse survival sim where society would be attempting to recycle as close to 100% as possible of every single thing they could get their hands on.

The three linked enemies move before they shoot. It is possible for them to stand behind the shuttle while it is your turn, and you can not shoot them because there is high cover between you and them (the shuttle's side), but then its their turn, they move and gain line of sight, and shoot you.

Once they do, then on the next turn you can shoot them because they had line of sight when they shot you, and did not/could not move after shooting, so now you can retaliate.

As an operative sniper make sure you take the covert protocol talent, it makes low cover even more protective than high cover for you, and take the perfect spot ability. Covert protocol + perfect spot = 90% chance incoming fire will hit cover.

Originalmente postado por -=8=-:

A lot of people here compare this to CoD like that’s automatically a bad thing. Forget the fast TTK for a moment and look at what CoD gets right — the weapon handling, animations, and attention to detail are top-tier. The guns feel great, they’re satisfying to use, and the gameplay loop is exciting and addictive. Maybe Battlefield could benefit from borrowing a few more of those strengths, whilst staying true to battlefield

But people play CoD to get the CoD feel and people buy Battlefield to get the Battlefield feel. Doea anybody want a CoD with 64 players, destruction and full of vehicles?

Originalmente postado por Gunfreak:

Originalmente postado por Thermal Lance:

You mean 7.62 is equivalent to 5.56 in this game? So, I shouldn't worry too much about it right?

They are definitely not the same. If you run 7.62mm you can always use JHP. As AP is just insane overkill.

The two gun that make it easiest, is the 416. Nice low recoil, 2-3 shots on semi should do the job.

If you want something small then the .300 dm4pdw packs a huge punch

They're definitely not the same in real life for sure, but I think they're close enough within the game that as long as you're using AP, the difference is negligible. I could be wrong though.

Originalmente postado por WANG ATTACK:

woooo

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/08/guaranteeing-fair-banking-for-all-americans/

Credit where credit is due, that is a good news . However seems like it only applies to banks, it doesn't do anything to payment processors...
So the battle is still going