Søkeresultater

Opprinnelig skrevet av Jedi:

Before that there were no more masteries going to be added. It said it was final and you have to combine your own playstyles.

No.

UI is fine not every game has to be Nintendo grade dumb down. game goes on sale every other day you can get ultimate for cheap has like season 1 though 6 op

can i join

Opprinnelig skrevet av GANDALFSBALLSACK:

Opprinnelig skrevet av SMK:

Youtube teaches these kids that anything less than 200 is "badly optimized", yet they'll never be able to tell you what optimization really means other than "runs really fast"

not a kid you moron,im just asking about this to get a better understanding from people that's all

Dude, just read my comment. Provide the missing factors , then I can confirm if you have a problem. LIke I said, I had the same configuration.

Opprinnelig skrevet av Achillezzz:

Opprinnelig skrevet av Creationist:

Yup, it is brain dead just like CoD.

Yes, indeed. Not sure what's with these other childish responses. Probably realism games like squad and PR are better going forward as BF certainly seems to be playing to the COD crowd. Sad after bf2 to see it go down this path.

so you just want slower strategic shooters and you mention bf2 which came out in 2005 A LOT has changed since then get over it LOL

Opprinnelig skrevet av Vampyre™:

Opprinnelig skrevet av sotnem:

titanium and stravinium were moved to the PvE zone in patch 1,1,0,17 around the 26th of june (we are now in august, patch also changed it to 50/50 - PvE/PvP at same time) - so before the current change in patch 1.1.20.0 there was titanium and stravinium in the PvE deep desert

but yes initially it was only in PvP deep desert, however initially was there any PvE zones...

what is the purpose of a pvp zone.... is it perhaps an area where attacking other players is acceptable behaviour or is it where attacking other players is unacceptable behaviour??

Atacking players on PVP area is an aceptable behaviour, that's PVP.

And as there were PVE players that dint wanted to go to PVP area anymore they were given a bigger PVE area with resources, full now, so they dons't need to go to PVP anymore.

What's wrong with that for PVP players? The size? Actually the smaller the PVP area is the easier PVP players looking for battle to find each others...

What's not acceptable is PVP wanabee players complain about defenseless players who doesnt want to be on PVP are now out of their reach.

PVP vs PVP players is still there, as it's always been, PVP has not been reduced.

Dedicate yourself to hunt down defenseless players that are foced to gothere or leave the game is not acceptable, it's a toxic behaviour that, amazingly, Funcom did not foresee and implemented as a mechanic in their game.

if they dont want to pvp - why did they go to PvP zone??
when every resource was in both PvE and PvP areas for atleast the past month just in different quantities

Opprinnelig skrevet av wowsrslybye:

Mabel is to be passed around by all of you while I get to have Prickett all to myself.

How do we tell him?

Yeah, you're right; that's not very intuitive. We need to figure a way to telegraph the difference between tame and wild to the player. Further, why the discrepancy between chickens and sheep/pigs? I've never had to tame a sheep or a pig before breeding them. Maybe that mechanic should be dropped altogether for chickens, too.

Otherwise, if you intend to keep the mechanic, maybe chickens should flash an icon that shows you need to feed them by hand first. There needs to be some signal if you want to differentiate wild and tame chickens, even if it's just something simple like a color change from brown to white chickens or something.

Opprinnelig skrevet av MerekiDor:

This is how the Gunship is coded in HL2, it reacts to a very limited selection of weapons. Some gun makers code their rocket launchers to deal damage to Gunships, but most people not. This is basically not a Map Sweepers issue, but we tried to give players other tools of dealing with gunships (Anti-Air Missile + Orbital Beam).

Aah gotcha, I wondered if that was the case but wanted to make sure

Opprinnelig skrevet av hemingslay:

youre dim

Your parents weren't dim for abandoning you at the orphanage