Resultados de búsqueda

Und wer soll da mitmachen? Niemand von den Großen hat Bock auf großen Krieg

Играйте сразу на доблесть так в разы интереснее будет.

刚刚游戏试了一下，外出的官员还是没有办法更换住宅

Hello everyone! I made it to act 3 and realized very quickly I am much too low in level and skill to fight Renoir at Lumiere, so I thought I should probably go explore the world a bit and find other things to do. I am having a hard time though, most things I am finding are too high in level/ability for me and kill me fairly quickly.

My team currently hovers around levels around 37/38. I tried reading some guides but I wasn't sure they seemed to really fit what I was looking for- I am looking for a good starting point, good beginning side quests to complete around this level that will help me progress.

Publicado originalmente por Hedrack:

Accept Claire's offer, lie to Marie to have her leave, distract the priest, sneak up on the priest, use the plush lungs.

How does one get the plush lungs?

Publicado originalmente por Mick Salvage:

I wonder why they don't us to talk about Startash? :D

What's that game then? Ron Jeremy in space?

Publicado originalmente por TCz:

I am not sure if this is intended, but local in-game high scores (for both the main game and challenges). as well as in-game settings do not save. High scores are submitted and saved to the online leaderboards correctly, it's just in-game settings that don't seem to save.

It because the game is running under emulation and the rom doesn't support sram saving. I really do think for digital versions sram should be added.

Publicado originalmente por Shahin:

It's honestly ridiculous how Overwatch can just slap a VAC ban on someone without solid proof or a proper manual review. You can't just ruin a player's reputation and years of effort based on some lazy or flawed detection system.

A player with hundreds or even thousands of hours clearly has real skill , not some random cheater. If Overwatch can't distinguish between actual skill and hacks, then the system is broken. This kind of careless action kills trust in the entire anti-cheat process.

Review the case properly, and stop punishing legit players.

defending a friend is one thing. but getting things wrong while defending your friend, kind of defeats the purpose of defending your friend.

1) he's got a gameban and not a vacban
2) gameban can be given for one of a few things, which you can see earlier in the thread where the link to gameban CS2 is given. Vacbans are for cheating only
3) bans are delayed
4) i have seen accounts being banned where it has either more hours in a game or games, or more items worth large amount of money (whether i see items worth a few cents or not) or large amount of bought games. which doesn't matter one bit.
5) this is a community only forum and not an appeal forum

Publicado originalmente por andy:

You do understand that this entire essay you wrote describes the term "subjective", right? Objective are things based on facts, something that can be measured and verified by anyone with the same result.

It does not describe that. And, yes, based on 'facts' we humans produce based on our measurements, perception, cognition and understanding. You're trying way to much to lean into existential and philosophical aspects of subjectivity. Following your logic objectivity doesn't even exist