Resultados de búsqueda

Mostrando 41-50 de 294,758,214 aportaciones
14
1
Spirit Valley Official Launch
20
This thread is dead. Ignore it :D
Ahora mismo
Thegamingnerd4525
85
Is WG even trying to hide the rigging any more?
Ahora mismo
YASAMATA_HEROWATA
En el foro "Off Topic"
71
Trump made it a crime to be homeless
Ahora mismo
Tonepoet
Publicado originalmente por Despiser:
My point was to ulfrinn that Trump doesn't go through the houses but bypass them with a pen because he mentioned the legislative branch. It's irrelevant what is in every individual order. It's actually wasteful to be paying all those high salaries for doing half the work. No wonder they're so silent.

First that's a bit of a complaint that's common to presidents in general. S.N.L. has a skit about Obama doing more or less the same thing, and it's really less so picking on Obama specifically as it is a civics lesson in how things really work, as opposed to how we learned they are supposed to work. The president doesn't need a new authorization from congress for every little thing he does. Numerous laws already exist on the books for him to squiggle his little pen about.

Plus it really isn't irrelevant. The extent to what Trump can be held accountable for are his top down orders, so if there is nothing particularly insiduous about the order itself, then he can't be held at fault for its implementation. At some point in time we do have to recognize that there are overzealous officers who bear some part of the responsibility for how the executive branch operates. The president leads the executive branch. He doesn't personally go kicking down tents. If nobody's reading the orders, then nobody can really say what Trump is or isn't doing.

And his order is to use the framework of existing laws, so if there are no such laws nothing gets done. And if there are such laws, then you have to ask a more important question: Who passed those laws in the first place? The legislature has a bit more of the accountability for what happens than the president to be honest.


Publicado originalmente por xBCxRangers:

"Or you can spend funds more efficiently." I'm sure he could have, but what he is done is cut taxes adding near 5 trillion to the national debt. And so he has not cut relatively anything efficiently to the tune of 5 trillion.

And so if Mr Trump wants to borrow and spend his way thru his presidency, he may need to borrow hundreds of billions of dollars to give to states specifically to aid the homeless crisis, being the federal government does not have the authority themselves.

And given he is already cutting funding to states that have these needs in effort to give those monies to Mr Netanyahu or Mr Zelensky, Border Patrol or to the Rich, this problem will indefinitey continue up and until taxes are raises to remedy the issue.

Eeh, first when I wrote that I meant with regards to the allocation of funding afforded to this specific issue. Not broader policy at large. He's cutting funds from supervised drug consumption sites. Ain't Zelensky payin' the U.S.A. back with that minerals deal? Wasn't that like, half the point of making him sign the dotted line?

Plus the U.S.A. sends truckloads of money to Isreal. What else is new?

Publicado originalmente por Despiser:
What is even more absurd is adding that much to the debt despite cutting social programs and the huge tariff tax to revenue. How is it possible to not be running a surplus let alone 5 trillion debt? Must be stuffing rich pockets and military, there's no other explanation.

He has big ambitions on manufacturing. Tax cuts on factories manufacturing U.S. made goods. If he can manage that, maybe some of these poor wretches will be able to get themselves a job with on-site training. Maybe not even in manufacturing, but from one of the jobs that opens up when possibly as many as 20% of working Americans switch to manufacturing themselves[www.statista.com].

Based on 133 million full time employees that's 26.6 million people who could be switching jobs[www.statista.com].

There are only about 771,480 homeless people across all of the U.S.A., in all categories of homelessness[usafacts.org]

If employers lose employees to manufacturing, then not only might these people find it easier to find a job, but these jobs might have to pay more and be a little less picky about who they hire in order to attract work.
7
WEATHER?
Ahora mismo
Eddy
13
new update when?
Ahora mismo
Lindy Bomber
4
Convenes
Ahora mismo
Miomazi
0
Updates & Optimizations:
Ahora mismo
小康宝
1
Co-Op Open Beta Update, August 21st, 2025
Ahora mismo
werboweski
Mostrando 41-50 de 294,758,214 aportaciones