293,534,110件中 51-60 を表示
0
Secure Boot & TPM 2.0
As a long-time multiplayer gamer, I fully support Electronic Arts’ decision to make system-level requirements like Secure Boot and TPM 2.0 mandatory for Battlefield 6. These prerequisites should be strictly enforced, especially for access to multiplayer mode.

Frankly, I am relieved that EA is finally taking decisive action against cheaters and hackers. Fair competition in multiplayer has been severely impacted in recent years due to the growing number of exploiters. Games like Warzone and earlier Battlefield titles have suffered immensely from abuse through cheat software, robbing many players – myself included – of long-term enjoyment.

Secure Boot ensures that only signed, trusted software is loaded during system startup. This significantly reduces the risk of so-called rootkits or hidden kernel-level malware. TPM 2.0 complements this security chain by adding hardware-based verification mechanisms and integrity checks.

EA's new anti-cheat system, called Javelin, operates on the kernel level – the deepest part of the operating system. This is necessary because modern cheats often run at that level as well. Javelin intervenes early and prevents unauthorized code from being executed at all. As a result, gameplay is no longer manipulated by external software. The focus returns to skill, tactics, and fair play – not technical tricks.

Additionally, hardware-based identification enables a far more effective way to ban repeat offenders. Those caught cheating can be permanently excluded via IP or hardware ID bans. This prevents them from simply rejoining with a new account.

Of course, these requirements are not without drawbacks. Users with older systems or platforms that do not support Secure Boot or TPM 2.0 – for example, Linux-based systems or the Steam Deck – are completely excluded from playing the game. EA has already confirmed that Battlefield 6 will not be supported on the Steam Deck. Furthermore, some players have raised concerns about data privacy. The deep system integration of a kernel-level anti-cheat understandably causes discomfort, even though no misuse has been reported so far.

It is also important to note that these security protocols are not optional. If Secure Boot is disabled or the system lacks a TPM 2.0 chip, the game simply will not launch. Exceptions are neither provided nor planned.

Despite these limitations, I firmly believe these measures are necessary and justified. Multiplayer must remain free of manipulation. Anyone who values a fair gaming experience will accept these protections, even if it means upgrading hardware or adjusting system settings.

I fully understand players who are excluded due to technical reasons or who have legitimate privacy concerns. However, in the end, the principle is simple: those who wish to play Battlefield 6 must also be willing to accept the conditions required. Those who refuse can turn to other games – but without the same level of anti-cheat protection.

In conclusion, the requirements for Secure Boot and TPM 2.0 in Battlefield 6 are not an obstacle, but a necessary safeguard. The future of fair online gaming depends heavily on the intelligent and consistent implementation of robust security systems. EA is clearly taking the right approach with Battlefield 6. I fully support it.
3
闪退
k1mon
"Sea Power 総合掲示板" 掲示板内
26
Campaign Mission 3
2
make it offline to play
1
Would of preferred it staying in America old games where fun
"Project Zomboid Support" 掲示板内
5
I cant craft anything like i cant open ammo boxes craft sheet
Beard
22
Fair matchups or not?
12
Too many steps to run the game (SecureBoot)
AusKarlos
5
Too much wine...
2 分前
Haeth
12
New Monster Hunter Title
2 分前
Shiloh
293,534,110件中 51-60 を表示