Hasil Pencarian

非常好更新，不过我怎么觉得更新以后cpu占用变多了

Diposting pertama kali oleh RealBenjamillion:

Nobody's perfect, as they say. I'm sure there's plenty of things that you and your friends fail at that you dare not admit for the sake of trying to look good for the entirety of this thread. It's not about "being unable to see" it's accepting that I'm a normal human being that makes choices, and my choice is playing for enjoyment and not frustration.

But I don't lie to myself and others about these things and dom't argue online to protect my ego lol.
I'm willing to admit when I can't do something legit. Such as beating Contra 3, that game is too hard for me so I made a save state at the final level.
I won't pretend and lie to people and say I beat Contra 3 legit because save states are part of the Contra Anniversary Collection..

Diposting pertama kali oleh Vindred:

I find it striking that when people defend having T6 resources predominantly in PvP areas, they do so without ever talking about how much fun the PvP is.

What they say is some variation on 'if you can't stand it, then you should stay out.'

In other words, 'Hey, if I had to put up with eating human excrement to get T6 materials, then guess what, you have to eat human excrement if you want them too. It's only fair! Just how do you propose to get people to eat excrement otherwise??! Nobody wants to do it otherwise! DUH!

If you don't take the last tier of materials, the transport ornithopter, aerial combat, the spice harvester and for that matter large-scale spice mining, along with most of the meta game, which we're going to continue to pretend can be dominated from hagga somehow, and lock it all behind T6, what is even the point of participating in the (optional! ) PvP?? WELL?!'

And so that sentiment is going over just like you'd expect.

Not even specifically about the resources. Just that the pvp is utter dogshite and people know it. The "pvpers" that defend this garbage are exactly as described above. Either that, or they're toxic griefing scumbags.

I'm just curious, what's the difference between mapping and campaign in POE 2? I haven't reached maps yet but essentially they seem the same to me. You go to a 'place', you kill some mobs, you kill a boss, get some loot, and progress forward. Whether it's in a campaign or in a map... what is changing?

Diposting pertama kali oleh Black Hammer:

The gear is mostly sidegrades and inconsistently balanced. Most of the time there's a clear Best In Slot option for any given class.

You are somewhat rushed depending on how you have the game set up and what victory you want. It's very easy for the other human factions to die off, either to each other or to the Pandorans.

You'll probably end up playing the way the developers intended; character skills are VERY strong in this game, meaning a single well-built soldier will clear a map mostly solo in 2-3 turns. The game is balanced around this sort of thing; the AI gets units that can mind control or artillery fire from beyond your visual range, so you're expected to be able to cross 2/3rds of the map in a single turn and attack 3+ times.

I'd highly recommend checking out the Terror From the Void mod, which is an overhaul that really improves a lot of things.

Yeah the factions being hostile against each other is very annoying. In Legendary at three months (i think the events that shift their negative attitude to each other is scripted and very few events can slightly "offset these") they attack each other more than pandorans attack them. Every day 1-3 havens are attacked by other haven factions.
Most of them cant even stand alone against a pandoran, pure or exalted assault but they waste their resources and manpower against each other. And very annoying too. To have to interven each time.

Is this supposed to be a joke? Do you really believe that telling the player base that it's essentially a "skill issue", that will be solved with a few mechanic tweaks, is the right direction here?

Let's go to the fundamental core, what CB is, and what the Chariot and the "vision" you have does with it.

1. High risk/reward never worked the way you try to claim in your statement. The main "risk", always came from controlling AI soldiers, NOT from controlling the hero. So by actually making a unit that can be fully controlled by the player, without having his attention split and relying on AI behaviour, actually LESSENS the risk considerably.

2. CB is at its fundamental core a strategy game and its main features are 2 things:

2.1. The multi-tasking of hero and unit, creating a considerable complexity curve.

2.2. Massive battles with a lot of "soldier mass" on the field. There may be quite some games that focus on medieval combat, but CB stands out by providing the "feeling" of a "big battle" happening.

Those both main features are exactly, what the Chariot systematically dismantles by design.
The Chariot:
- removes the strategic multi-tasking entirely giving the player full control over a single, powerful unit
- is just being an overglorified mount, that actually REDUCES the perceived size of the battle.

Dear devs, let's be honest: When there are 5-6 chariots cruising around, there are 150-200!!! less soldiers on the field. What prior seemed like a "battle", now appears like a small skirmish. So please stop beating around the bush. Your vision disalligned with the game's direction and the chariot was a conceptual mistake. Trying to find excuses with "balancing" won't make the unit any more attractive and any less polarising. It's polarising, not just because of the balance problems, but because it fundamentally changes what the game is about.

Please stop dismantling what makes the game unique.

yea you are absolutely right.

However, maintenance does happens, it just doesnt need to go offline, its done live (no point going in to tec details). And in that regard they are unique in the Online games world.

Guild wars has a marvelous infrastructure (something that ppl dont give them credit for).
Not only that, as it doesnt require huge amount of data transmission too.
Hell, i even remeber playing guild wars 1 on a 56k modem with no delays :p (at the time ofc)

Diposting pertama kali oleh bonewax21:

Diposting pertama kali oleh Epiderme Tostões:

it's a "Z490 VISION G" apparently (i hope im not getting the wrong thing) Gigabyte being the manufacturer
the disk i was downloading the game in is a mbr

well 2 things to note then. You need to convert your mbr to gpt, lots of threads on here tell you how to do that, frankly im surprised people still have mbr on their boot drive but ok. Secondly gigabyte boards are tricky (i have one) when you change the bios you need to disable CSM then reboot, then enable secure boot. You have to switch it from standard to custem then back to standard again. then reboot.

it's not my boot drive, i was going to use my second less powerful disk for now, because 1- the first (aka C:) is kinda full and 2- idk if it's required or if i'd be ok performance-wise just using the other one

in terms of the BIOS stuff, IIRC that's exactly what i did, i disabled CSM, rebooted, enable security boot and set it to standard, i didn't do the "standard to custom to standard" thing, ty for telling me i'll try it next time

But nonetheless, when i saved and exit after doing all of that (with the secure boot enable on standard) my pc restarts and goes back to the BIOS, and the strange thing is: when i tried to revert the changes (disable secure boot and enable CSM again) it still went back to the BIOS after restarting, it only started working again when i used the "load last working setting" feature, and im pretty sure it has the exact same settings i had just before doing so, but it worked fine

either way, ty for the advice, i'll remember that if i feel bored enough to give this game a chance again

.

Diposting pertama kali oleh Garnage:

Thanks, glad I'm not the only one. I kept feeling the female names seemed more auto-generated and out of place with the theme.

I know, sometimes they don't even make sense, but i do enjoy giving names.

In my current game I named many cities as famous ones like Waterdeep, Hellsgate, Sandpike, Neverwinter and such, while also naming characters after real kings or famous characters like Elminster, Theseus, Beowulf, Arthur, Cesar, Brutus, Tyr, Urden and so on.

Yeah, I love history and RPG.