Keresési eredmények

good

Yeah no I'm not gonna involve real world issues with a video game

"Pre-Load opens August 4th"

It says it on the Store page

In a red box

How much more clear do you need it?

Glodium eredeti hozzászólása:

Severe skill issue. you will eventually learn the game don't worry.

This coming from someone who barely has any hours in all 3 games, telling someone with over 2k hours on all 3 games combined that it's a "skill issue". Ya, ok

patrick68794 eredeti hozzászólása:

Double-UC eredeti hozzászólása:

Yep and the BETA is also telling people to buy the versions of the game they already own.

The beta is available across every platform and store the game is on. It's just a generic message. If they were requesting permission to see if you owned the full game or not you'd be ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ about that instead though, so carry on

Absolutely! Not giving access to people that have purchased and giving access to people that have not is hilarious. I would hope failure doesn't happen and people have learned, but we will see.

half your CPU is being used to run the crypto mining spyware anticheat

Thexan eredeti hozzászólása:

Skullpunk eredeti hozzászólása:

oh yeah they're totally not gonna get banned for promoting racism and discrimination in games, its these damn softies that can't handle cursing! and yes, this thread and every other thread on this game is moderated.

lmfao its never been a problem in tf2

TF2 has moderation what are you talking about?

Shepherd Bemeu eredeti hozzászólása:

Dear Devs,

I'm really disheartened to see that the game is being developed in a direction that continues to misunderstand what each civilization is 'geared' towards. The idea that the Egyptians shouldn't have a superior defense, to make up for their substandard infantry and to homogenize with their slower, more persistent scouting, seems like a gross misunderstanding of the basic conceits behinds the classic factions. I'm not against the idea that the game should employ more action, but the idea that defenses are supposed to be overcome, rather than that they should dissuade attacks or force hard decisions, is disappointing.

As someone who grew up with this game, my perspectives on game balance are largely informed from how the original played. The use of towers with walls to hold back the foe was economical. You could force an enemy to go elsewhere. You could support and supplant your weak infantry by giving them some sturdy dirt to stand atop. The Spearman, as a cost effective, population-inefficient general tank was suited well to protecting the fringes of your control area, and keeping foes off the towers early game.

I understand that, to make sure walls behave in an enjoyable way for all parties, they have to be something that a serious siege attack can bypass. But with the effect of splash damage, repairing them is a painful chore. It's more effective for ones time to simply not use walls, and not use towers, and instead spam out fortresses.

This isn't as fun.

Defending your resourcing operations becomes more difficult, more of a task for a standing army to see to, and makes the home field advantage non-existant. It robs players of the ability to overcome the population difference by investing less resources into strong defenses that, by their very nature, are static and are committed to that one location. Improper defense placement can and will damn one to failure. That's serious resources spent, several units at least. It might have some resource-to-resource equivalence, but the lack of mobility, the absence of redeployment, and the fact that these defenses simply don't stand up anymore to actually stopping smaller attacks makes the entire aspect, a core aspect of war, something to be ignored.

Please, give consideration to how an aggression bias in your design is disadvantaging your players and, more importantly, harming some of the identity of this wonderful classic game.

because you are noob , boy :)
Many guys are experts of Egypt

You don't get to play until the 9th. This is why everything is locked. It's been communicated beyond belief.