Zoekresultaten

invite

Origineel geplaatst door Midra, Lord of Frenzied Flame:

Secure boot = no cheaters it really is that simple.
Wonder why don't every other MP game enforce this? It's so simple smh...

Yeah that's why there are no cheaters in Valorant or any other games that require it /s

1.為什麼蛋套裝滿了之後 蛋全變成不可孵化的銀蛋
這樣不是變相削弱嗎? 直接沒辦法孵化新的哈基寶

2.還有官方可以移除會大量產生小丑盒子的寶物嗎?
很影響遊玩

3.另外痛苦房到底在哪 有人知道嗎?

Origineel geplaatst door Estellese:

Large map
Continents
9 AI - No teams
extra ancient wonders
No handicaps (dislike the flat 30% damage/defense)
Custom AI difficulty. (Harder than brutal)
Custom AI - All ascended characters.. some custom made to be much stronger than usual with extra traits and such.
Eldritch realm - sometimes
New fated realms thing
Dormant seals - sometimes.


While I put 9 AI in, with the custom difficulty I usually don't need to face nine of them. They usually take a few of each other out. Especially if chosen destroyers are on the map.

Cool. With the game released in May 2023, you could have played at least 2 or 3 of those matches by now. :P

tbh let people be racist at there own peril like its annoying when Elijah says the nword for the 10th time but just dont pay attention the real problem posting the gooner flags

oh right i forgot you guys weren't even developing this game that much in the first place, would ya'll like me to come over there and do a luigi mangione on your boss? get rid of that toxic guy so the real devs can actually have creative freedom

Google your motherboard and add "Enable secure boot" with it. Follow instructions. Takes about 5-10mins with a couple of restarts.

And then ensure you have the latest graphics driver as BF6 needs 580.88 version to run.

Origineel geplaatst door EF_Neo1st:

It being design choice (obviously not limitation "even in the past" as there were games where,as example, a boss would not deal body hitbox dmg, just projectiles and atacks)

It depends on the game, how far back you want to go, and what caused it to be a limitation in the first place. Just saying some games had it and some didn't is a gross oversimplification of what developers were dealing with, and in most cases is the wrong way to think about it. It's a good point, but it's hardly an argument, because it ignores the reasons some chose to go with it and some didn't. A boss might, for example, not deal damage by physical contact because their "body" wasn't actually their body at all, it was (in every way except visually) part of the stage itself, and attacking that "body" might also not do any damage to the boss. There are several examples like this, where they could do something like that and get away with it because most people (especially back then) weren't savvy enough to notice what they'd actually done, instead of what the visuals misled people into thinking they'd done.

Origineel geplaatst door EF_Neo1st:

it is just going against the devs design choice and the design of the genre.

Yeah, no ♥♥♥♥ it's going against the design choice, the issue is WHY they made it. As well as why it's sometimes part of the genre's design and sometimes not, and what causes it to ebb and flow as a trend. Again, there's a lot of nuance in this matter that you're overlooking.

Origineel geplaatst door EF_Neo1st:

It is no "you are wrong / no you" type of discussion because the discussion itsefl should not exist to begin with, it is similar to saying a souls-like is limited from cancelling animations when it is clear design choice of a genre

That's a generalization, though, not an absolute. Much like here, it's such a minor, nuanced mechanic that insisting it always be included prohibits iteration and innovation on the genre. And since devs are ultimately just gonna make the games they want to make (including whether or not they want to factor in the opinions of a very small handful of players with very niche concerns) all it leads to is some people just becoming insufferable genre snobs. You see it a lot in roguelikes, with some people just being ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ and insisting that it's not a roguelike unless it fully adheres to the Berlin Interpretation, even though there were some stupid decisions made in the Berlin Interpretation, with a couple purely superficial aspects being counterproductively categorized as core aspects, and even though it was only ever intended to measure where the game was positioned on a broad spectrum, and not (as some idiots still think) meant to be a strict checklist or a rigorous test that a game had to meet or pass in order to even be considered a roguelike. And these people insist that if it's not a 100% "pure" or "proper" roguelike, it can't be considered one at all. Eventually, they had to be differentiated as "traditional roguelikes" and just regular "roguelikes", but the arguments and the stupidity still pop up from time to time.

i regret i bought this game after i saw a fish stuck and jumping in the air above the river while exploring

cherche des francais pour faire session de grimpete