Resultados da busca

Escrito originalmente por freezray:

...

A lot of words to say not very much. I'll address the important bit at the end.

Escrito originalmente por freezray:

What exactly do think my argument is? That NO ONE would be upset if things were even slightly different? Better yet since you like to put words in peoples mouths go ahead and write my opinion for me.

Escrito originalmente por freezray:

In reality the vast majority of "legacy" fans came from CK2 which is the clear blueprint and which has nearly every system CK3 has ...

You can't be a fan of CK2 if you hate the direction CK3 because that direction BEGAN in CK2 ...

Escrito originalmente por freezray:

This is why I find the idea that CK is "changing" as a premise to be utterly absurd ... I jumped right into the game and it played almost exactly like I expected it too based solely on my experience from CK2.

I think your argument is that CK3 is basically just CK2+, and therefore people that like CK2 have no excuse complaining about CK3 because CK3 is just CK2 but better. The fact that CK2 has beloved content that CK3 does not have is a simple disproof of what I think your argument is.


If the above is missing context, please provide the necessary context. I don't think I removed anything essential.

mine layer adjustments seem a bit odd. It was the obvious counter to the ram. Seems like it's not going to be the counter it needs to be anymore.

I get wanting to balance it a bit, but that's a really long arm time when somebody is chasing you and you zoom by the mines they lay.

Guess time will tell. Glad to see the ram being addressed but that also seems a bit harsh. I'd like to see the device itself just have a longer repair time (like quite longer) than a new re-arm time. I find defending it inside the ship more challenging than from a single drill charge outside.

Escrito originalmente por Kamen Z:

Update: Itch.io ditched the adult tag entirely, but they are looking for a new payment processor who won't turn up their nose to adult content.

I'm quite frankly utterly baffled as to why debit companies aren't just pouncing directly upon this opportunity. There's a massive market vacum just sitting there for them to steal entire distributors out from their noses, if not to completely bust the kneecaps of the hegemony of digital transactions, and yet debit card companies are sleeping even harder at the wheel than the people on the titanic.

Since nighttime buffs the infected, would that affect the less human aspects of Crane's character?

Assuming you want to play singleplayer.. You want to go...

Create -> Singleplayer -> It'll load you to a blank table and a bunch of options. If this doesn't pop up go to the top of your screen. should say "Games"

TTS comes with some basic games, Chess, Cards, Go, whatever else in the "Classic" section.

Than there are payed-for DLC table top games you can buy on the store, those are DLC.

Than you'll find all your "normal" games on teh steam workshop.

This is very much a community driven 'platform' not really a game by itself. Download what you wanna play with on the workshop!

Czy zainstalowałeś oba mody jednocześnie? Spróbuj odinstalować oba i zainstaluj tylko jeden z nich. Standardowa baza danych (XL) pochodzi od FM Zocker, prawda?
Ważne: rozpocznij nową grę i wybierz własną bazę danych podczas uruchamiania.

I looked at the wiki but the description doesn't seem to match with my experience. It indicates that when the sphere starts acting up, you send it to fight your enemies and after it wrecks them it vanishes. However the last time I tried that it completely ignored them, teleported from the other side of the map in a series of jumps to my base and made things doubly unpleasant in that the pawns which were still functional now had to deal with what the sphere was supposed to destroy.

So my question is, what exactly does it attack? I'm pretty confident it'll take action against human raiders since I used it successfully against some neanderthals prior to it acting up. However the time it was worse than useless I sent it against manhunter macaws. Despite being right in the middle of seventy of them did absolutely nothing at all, behaved like they simply didn't exist. Do distant humanoids take priority over close animals maybe? The macaws were moving very fast, so maybe it was chasing them so to speak... Didn't actually attack any though, not even once. How about other entities? Does it matter whether they're hostile, or just shamblers stumbling around randomly? Haven't tested it against mechs yet.

Basically I just don't want a repeat of the earlier disaster, because I barely survived that. So many missing limbs... Thanks ahead of time for any assistance.

people declare nonsense because they are afraid they have something wrong themselves.

in discovering they cannot discern their own wrongness, they place the burden on the other instead.

248514

Escrito originalmente por 10% Butz:

Escrito originalmente por Jacklesix:

thats disgusting, not worth 50 then.

Stop being poor. 12 hours of good quality is better than 30 hours of mediocrity.

Escrito originalmente por Wilku21:

I hate this stupid argument that only works if you're liking the game.
Not everybody will be enjoying it the same way you did.

Okay and? Let's apply this stupid length argument to a similar media then, shall we? Would you rather pay for the 5/10 rated movie that is 120 minutes long or pay for the 9/10 rated movie that is 90 minutes?

How about we will stop using that stupid argument and tell others why did you enjoyed the game you played? Those silly arguments bring nothing to the table and only annoys people who are looking for reasons to buy the game and instead they got stupid "well, if I would have to pay X for Y hours I played, then...".