Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
Then if those 200 did the same thing there would be 40,000 cheats banned instead of 200. Offer it to the 40,000 and not many would be unbanned as there would not be enough cheats to hand in to get 8,000,000 people banned because not that many cheat anyway.
I think turning the cheaters against there own kind is a concept that might just work.
... but that's like saying "Windows never crashes, its just the programmers who make mistakes" or indeed the classic "guns don't kill, people do".
Also, no, X-Spectate originally banned people, however it was changed from ban to a kick - although the people banned were apparently NOT unbanned.
i wont cheat again :(
I made mistake and VAC did right by banning me
now i noticed my mistake!
Cause that equals to the fact the account hasn't cheated.
Keep in mind that I say account and not person.
I'll let BurtonJ know so he can't tell you exactly what you did if you like, He loves telling people what cheat they used, What game was it and did you make any modifications to it, or let someone else use it or get keylogged or phished?
Vac doesn't ban for random stuff, it must see a definition that is exclusive to the cheat to ban. That or see modified files that are not allowed to be modified.
http://steamcommunity.com/discussions/forum/9/882959061742832644/