Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский)
Español - Latinoamérica (латиноам. испанский)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский)
Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
I am sorry if I am mistaken here from what you have posted just now, but it seems that you do not in fact have an understanding of how VAC works. VAC does not care about reports, or rank, or a user in general, as it is totally automated. What you seem to be referring to here is the Overwatch system, as that has a basis for functionality on reports from other users. You do understand the systems are totally different, don't you ?
Please forgive me if I have made some sort of error in understanding you here.
http://steamcommunity.com/discussions/forum/9/541907867784316839/#c541907867784576865
http://steamcommunity.com/discussions/forum/9/541907867784316839/
Ah, I actually don't have CS:GO. I have heard of Overwatch, am not familiar with it.
I have in general assumed that VAC bans can be put in place manually. Perhaps this isn't so, but I would not understand why not. Afterall, an automatic system must have someone with high enough authority to manually control it as well. Valve can't ignore 3000 cheat reports even if VAC doesn't automatically detect something, can it? Eh, it doesn't matter either way.
I'm mostly grasping at straws. I have absolutely no clue as to what may have caused the ban, so I'm considering absolutely everything.
VAC is a totally automated system. There is no human intervention during a scan of your PC, therefore there is a much more consistent and error-free environment in existence, you see. Humans do make mistakes, but on an individually considered basis, computers do not.
That is why VAC is used by Valve, in my humble opinion. It will catch more cheaters in a wave with the least chance of false positives than any other anticheat system around. That is partiatlly extractet from one of the good mods here of these forums, and they are all good, so as to not show any confusion here from me.
http://steamcommunity.com/discussions/forum/9/541907867784316839/#c541907867784576865
Perhaps you have seen this link by now, as it navagates you to the quote of that good moderator here of these forums. I participated in that well-debated discussion also, and we had the priveledge of other good moderators leaving comments also during that discussion. The thread is stil open, in fact.
http://steamcommunity.com/discussions/forum/9/541907867784316839/
This is the link to that thread in general, as you may have discovered at this point.
There are also two pinned threads conveinently placed at the top of this forum on the main page, and they are an excellent source of information.
One thread is concerning the VAC system, and the other is concerning the Overwatch, or "Game" ban system. When a user is Overwatch banned, they recieve a game ban red text on their profile home page that they do not have the ability to hide, and the same goes for VAC bans.
The Overwatch system is where the human intervention takes place, and you should read that thread, as it is explained there much better than I personally can.
Please ask specific questions here if you currently have any at all. The only foolish question is the one that remains unasked, you see.
Oh, it's the other Rain.
I think I have him friended, and we've played a game together.
I was not aware he was VAC banned. I have played a game online with him before on a VAC secured server. Perhaps it was a different account.
If you're assumption is that we are the same person, I am afraid not.
Many people have the name Rain in this game (thus the Epilithic, to make it unique).
You might be saying something else, sorry if I misunderstood you.
If you do believe that we are the same person, then I respect your thought. I am not Srgt Rain, and will not attempt to prove so beyond saying this. I am not aware of whether Srgt Rain was banned legitimately or not.
some even have bans on the same day.
with your friends list you should be an expert on VAC.
Your assumption is correct. I'm sorry. My wandering brain got the better of me.
Why I was banned is something that would not be discovered by listing every possibility. It is something I need to know eventually, but will not be accomplished here.
I see. Since you write it with certainty, I will conclude that this is so.
It is what my research corroborates. I will try to focus on potential code based interferences with my communication to Steam support.
I actually agree with you. I am good with computers and a learning programmer, and Valve's current solution is the most logically viable one. Although I have been the target of VAC, I agree that it seems mostly well designed. The margin of error is significantly smaller than most other AC codes, and honestly, I have only met 2 hackers ever while playing TF2. Kudos to Valve.
Once again, thanks for your help. You seem to be pretty active on the forums, and I'm glad you came to post here.
I'm sorry if I have aroused suspicion. I don't think I'll be able to ease it. I understand if you choose to continue to suspect me. It will ultimately have been my own fault.
I was actually not aware of what a VAC ban was until I was banned.
I wrote a whole bunch here, but you like short posts. I'll try my best.
Perhaps it'll help you believe me a little bit more if I told you that I'm not here to try to prove my innocence, neither will I be upset if Valve ultimately chooses to keep the ban on me.
I don't care either way if you believe me or not. From your perspective, I could very well be a hacker. Thanks for posting here either way. I do appreciate the feedback. You have not been rude or disrespectful, but you have simply pointed out something suspicious. Thank you.
Thank you. The original point of the post was to try and find other banned players to see if I am an isolated case. This seems to be the case. I have a smaller chance of being unbanned, but so be it. The other point of the post was to share my experiences, in case it might help other players who are actually innocent. And your replies definitely will help in that regard.
If I am ultimately kept banned or unbanned, I'll update. It's only been 2 days, I would not be displeased if it took months for Valve to respond.
I did not see you list family share in your list of details.
I have one alternative account, which I have left because it is linked to an outdated email, and I wanted to have a fresh start. That account does not have a VAC ban, or any ban for that matter.
The other accounts are not alternative accounts. I do not think it is possible to prove whether they are or not. I will not attempt to challenge your allegation.
I am not aware of what you mean by "family share" in my list of details. If it does not have compromising effects, then I'll be glad to do this family share thing.
Honestly, I think you are dwelling on the wrong thing. Yes, it is right to be suspicious of me. Yes, you should be suspicious of me. However, had I chosen not to friend my "alternative account" or friend other VAC banned accounts, you should still be suspicious of me.
If I were you, I would be thinking "even if these were not alt accounts, this guy is probably a hacker." My friends list should have no bearing on whether I am suspicious or not. You should be suspicious of me no matter what. THAT is something I would understand, and respect.
I do not wish to take this any further. If you do reply, please let me know what family share is.
why would you keep friending cheaters on both accounts again and again?
if you did not family share there are two other things that can get you banned.
a hijacked account
logging in to a (public)computer with cheats and play a VAC secured server.
Your first assumption is that I have friended them "on both accounts again and again."
In my first account, I had not friended anybody that I did not know in real life. In fact, I had only played on vanilla servers. Your assumption is that my first account is Srgt Rain. Once again, that is not my first account.
As I wrote, I was not aware of VAC bans previously. I was not aware I was friending cheaters. I did not think it was possible these guys were cheaters, because they are guys I have played with online on a VAC secured server. The Srgt Rain account may have many cheaters friended, but it is not mine. For this account, the only account I actually own, I do not think it's possible to have many cheaters friended, since they've all played on VAC secured servers.
I think I had misinterpreted what you meant by Family Share. I have not shared my account with anybody, nor used it on any other computer. My account may have been hijacked, but my password appears to not be compromised. If the ban is a result of a hijack, then I'll take responsibility for the ban. But my password is complex, and it is relatively unlikely I have been target of a hijack.
I'm not sure what you mean by "if it would have added value to judge people here... etc." but thanks for your judgements anyways. You are taking the time to respond to me, so I appreciate that.
but you would have noticed that you were hijacked.
Yes that is true. I do use Steam Guard. My email also lets me know if it's been accessed from a different IP. It has not. It's a gaming email that I don't use frequently, but only to register for all my games, to prevent spam on my main / business email.
That does not reject the idea of being hijacked, but it's unlikely. Either way, Steam does not remove VAC bans as the result of hijacks, and if I were hijacked, that's my own fault.