What are the worst video game companies for you?

[⭐Rodent⭐]

For me are:

1 Trion-Gamigo tied with Bunggie
2 Fun Pimps
3 Fun Com

[crunchyfrog]

Автор сообщения: Crazy Tiger

Автор сообщения: crunchyfrog

or even Mario Kart 8 which is perhaps the perfect game.

I don't know why, but I find Mario Kart Wii to be much more enjoyable.

It is a great game and at first I largely agreed.

Until I played more of the latest one and on balance I'd say it edges it largely for the value for money thing. I'm not saying the Wii one ain't enjoyable but there's just so much good content (and no filler) with Mario Kart 8.

Point is though, it's a great example of Nintendo still being fine and worthy of holding up as such an exmaple.

[⭐Rodent⭐]

Mario Kart is the best!!!!

[Xhoas]

-The indie stone.
-Idea Factory.
-Hinterland studios.

[Silverkite]

EA, Ubisoft, Activision, Square Enix, Rockstar Games, Capcom, Sega, Deep Silver, Tripwire, Take 2, 2k, that mafia group buying the rights of dead franchises, Microsoft, Epic, Paradox, Sony, Nintendo, everyone who adds stupid launchers, Denuvo, EAC and EOS to their games

[FatalError]

honorable mention, paradox interactive

[kaibarnard]

EA - should get all 3 spots
Epic - for exclusives
Paradox - for DLC spam

[vizthex]

Автор сообщения: J4MESOX4D

Автор сообщения: vizthex

same here. Grew up with the Mario games, but they all seem easy and bland now.

the new Zelda games just feel like another generic open world game that just doesn't do it for me.

metroid is half the namesake of my favourite genre, but that franchise has been mostly dead for years. Might get the new ones later on, but they're expensive (and so is a switch). I don't wanna buy a whole console for 2 games.

never really cared about their other franchises.

Yeah, I kinda feel Nintendo games are judged to a very different standard compared to other multi-platform titles. I grew up playing and thoroughly enjoying all of their iconic brands and whilst it's great to see them thrive and release to huge acclaim still, I'm not sure if I've simply outgrown them or if the media are way too generous.

I finally got round to playing BOTW and found it to be just another bloated open world game with some very annoying mechanics and a Ubisoft-like design framework. I suppose if you solely play Nintendo then this may be revolutionary but for me, it's nothing I haven't seen a million times over.

same here.

Spider-Man is currently the only open world game i've genuinely enjoyed - basically only because of how fast you can zip through the city (though I did pick up Sleeping Dogs during the Steam sale, and it's pretty good so far). Everspace 2 as well, but that one's in space and not as much of an open world imo.

everything else just feels kinda generic. Same big open fields with a slow-ass movement speed that you can barely increase with almost nothing substantial to do between locations.

[vizthex]

Автор сообщения: FatalError

honorable mention, paradox interactive

Автор сообщения: kaibarnard

EA - should get all 3 spots
Epic - for exclusives
Paradox - for DLC spam

i dunno, (most of) their DLCs have actual content in them rather than just being a bunch of pointless cosmetics bloating your owned DLC number (borderlands moment).

now granted, i only own 2 of their games (Surviving Mars and Stellaris, the latter of which i've barely played lmao) - but it hasn't been a big deal to me. I'd rather get a nice chunk of content every 6 - 12 months over a thousand separate DLCs for a single costume each or some ♥♥♥♥.

[vizthex]

Автор сообщения: Crazy Tiger

My list remains empty. I'm just interested in games, I don't pay attention enough to the companies behind them to be able to put them in such lists.

then why comment lol?

[Lil C]-[ew C]-[ew is ☂д☂]

Techland For never rightfully fixing bugs;
Undead Labs Again for never...ever rightfully fixing bugs;
Piranha games For making such clanky game mechanic;
Treyarch;
Bethesda And again for never rightfully fixing bugs;
Eletronic Arts;
Rockstar North Everyone know what issue I'm talking about;

[⭐Rodent⭐]

Bethesda is bad too

[🦜Cloud Boy🦜]

A philosopher said,
The more bigger a politician is, the more critics he gets.

I can see plenty of people hate companies like Ubisoft, EA, Square Enix or Bethasda.
But this big companies are the one who are driving the gaming industry and has majority of the market share. People are buying from them anyway, despite the hate.

[Darzai]

1. EA
2. Ubisoft
3. Microsoft

Автор сообщения: 🦜Cloud Boy🦜

A philosopher said,
The more bigger a politician is, the more critics he gets.

I can see plenty of people hate companies like Ubisoft, EA, Square Enix or Bethasda.
But this big companies are the one who are driving the gaming industry and has majority of the market share. People are buying from them anyway, despite the hate.

You seem to misunderstand that philosopher. The fact that you get more critics when you become more known, does not automatically mean that those critics are wrong. Those are two different things.

Also, 'people' without context is meaningless. It can be anyone. You just assume the 'haters' are the same people as the buyers. There might be some overlap, but for how much is anyone's guess.

[⭐Rodent⭐]

Автор сообщения: 🦜Cloud Boy🦜

A philosopher said,
The more bigger a politician is, the more critics he gets.

I can see plenty of people hate companies like Ubisoft, EA, Square Enix or Bethasda.
But this big companies are the one who are driving the gaming industry and has majority of the market share. People are buying from them anyway, despite the hate.

I see it this way: The more bigger a politician is, more is the illicit money he get.
Or also: Become famous, then go to sleep.

[The Commendatore]

1. Bethesda
2. 343 Industries
3. Capcom