Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский)
Español - Latinoamérica (латиноам. испанский)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский)
Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
just upload images on 182x182px as that is the max size if i remember right
Made png with required size and resolution. And it was converted in ugly-looking jpeg. I thought: "OK, it's just convert all non-jpeg formats into jpeg, so i must use jpeg with quality taht i need!"
"Go f* yourself" steam told me. It just took my jpeg with notmal quality almost without compression artifacts AND CONVERTED it in jpeg once more! He converted jpeg in jpeg! And of course totally kill image quality.
Btw both jpegs ware almost same size. Mine was 8kb and steam's one was 9kb (such "hahaha").
Unbelievable logic...
And "stretching and scaling": as i said, i've made image of excactly steam-required size - 184x184. And in jpeg. And got low-quality jpeg in my profile/group page as result
http://cdn.akamai.steamstatic.com/steamcommunity/public/images/avatars/39/39be81e421ada806cb64133b024e97127423d656_full.jpg
Here what i get at group page. And here is original 184x184 jpeg-image:
https://leto10d.storage.yandex.net/rdisk/f7c1e9f47e8e72f4d93fab91cb66c72f/mpfs/Fj4GzKrogb0OxKaPMwXXBTH9IUVbV4LDFbi35Sonl-mAhjf7luMGF6KcNEwlq7yW_MXRk-Sr-vwNapKYDyPZ5A==?uid=0&filename=logo2_184_jpeg.jpg&disposition=inline&hash=&limit=0&content_type=image%2Fjpeg&rtoken=ecb638491cc2845c241c2e0d59348d9e&rtimestamp=53f0695f&force_default=no
http://cdn.akamai.steamstatic.com/steamcommunity/public/images/avatars/5d/5dcb648cb9e03ce65cc5d8083c9f9fb5471f6958_full.jpg
original image:
https://leto35h.storage.yandex.net/rdisk/149c1d07f193202e42100a6e14aa6ace/mpfs/HGaPLvV_P3Ktybt4vgImBEpYgLoIzZlV49YZFRYg3hHzP8iWHWk0a0mEYzCjTZxdjrgeIOmuEay3KG9oj7zeHw==?uid=0&filename=magobuono184_96.jpg&disposition=inline&hash=&limit=0&content_type=image%2Fjpeg&rtoken=4cc069a10f410e64800cc2aba2943a6a&rtimestamp=53f06d5e&force_default=no
Just zoom it to compare. You'll see the difference.
PS Sorry for so long links - steam don't allow me to post url from shorten-url services.
Badges, trading cards, and most other graphics on the site are higher quality, so heavy avatar compression isn't saving any bandwidth. Use better quality compression or just plain PNG.
Here's an example of the difference[abload.de].
Made some comparisons between the JPEG and PNG file sizes of my avatar. 1kb difference at 32px size (the most commonly seen size across the site), 4kb difference at 64px. My current profile background is 400kb.
***//////// --- EDIT --- ////////***
It seems to work much like many other social media websites/apps. If you try to upload a 100%-perfect image (without any sort of downsampling already applied), it will be recompressed and re-downsampled down with a default compression algorithm similar to those seen on early Facebook/Instagram UXs. So, I had a theory: Why not try to do the downsampling myself and then re-upload with an image (already in .JPG format) that has already been significantly downsized with my computer to get into that "butter zone" of <200KB? Despite all of the strong and vibrant colors in my avatar, I was able to lower the output quality of my JPG file from its original 252KB to 32KB. Just so you all know, the 252KB file was the size of my original PNG/JPGs I was getting very poor results uploading before.
I lowered the target quality once again (with Adobe Photoshop's "Export As.." feature) and got the file down to a staggeringly-low 32KB! I also made sure to do all image resizing (resizing and cropping the image to 182x182 pixels @72dpi) within PS as well, leaving virtually no image cropping, resizing nor downsampling/downconverting for Steam's form to have to do.
The resulting image comes out fairly vibrant without much loss of color, contrast nor depth. It may seem like an attempt to upload an image of already low file size and "poor quality" by most modern standards would result in an even poorer quality of image after its file was further scrutinized by the complex algorithm within Steam's servers. My test results, however, prove this to NOT be the case at all. Instead, the lower file size and less complex image (thanks to Photoshop's brilliant image dithering) actually results in an image that is 50% less in quality from its original, yet still maintains 100% of its composition as a whole. When the pre-downsized image is finally received by the "upload your own avatar" form on Steam, it is uploaded without any further conversion needed (aside from the output file necessary for image uploading to take place on a server in the first place) and is passed through with little/no change, if any.
If image file conversion were put into an analogy, you could look at it more simply by comparing it to TSA or customs when they check & inspect passenger baggage before boarding a plane.
My theory is that the server looks at that image as already being of perfect dimensions, resolution as well as file size and quite literally 'waves it through' the inspection process and outputs it as a similarly-low quality image into its [now] permanent home online, safe and sound in your user profile on Steam! :)
Conclusions:
• PNG files do NOT fair well when converted from .PNG format into .JPG format.
• Lowering the image quality down to at least 50% less of its original output file size as possible (without losing overall composition) seems to help the transition from your PC to the world wide web.
• Ensuring that your Avatar has less to it (in terms of high-contrast changes in color, little to no major changes in its depth-of-field, etc.) also seems to create a less complex, more simple image of low file size that needs little to no further downsampling once uploaded to the destination server.
Wow.