Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Companies paying others for exclusivity rights isn't a bribe.
I mean I'm not against colloquialisms or anything, but at a certain point you're wading into hyperbole and outright dishonesty.
I mean not liking the situation is fine. But trying to cast pretty mundane and typical business agreements as borderline criminal activities and malicious is really making a mockery of the issue and yourselves.
And I'm saying that as someone who almost exclusively buys PC games from Steam and wouldn't mind everything being available on the platform. But those days are gone and no amount fussing and wailing is going to bring them back. And companies who don't work to maintain Steam as the only store that matters aren't evil, bad, greedy or anything. It was never their job to make Steam the center of the universe no matter how convenient some of would find that to be now.
What Epic does though is equivalent to hanging out at the loading dock of the Tesco and watching what products come in to the store. If something looks like it's going to be popular, they approach the driver with a sack of money and say "Hey. This is yours if you don't sell these apples at Tesco."
Meanwhile, Tesco already had a display for those apples set up, but the product never arrives.
Yeah, implying that games basically belong to Steam and developers/publishers aren't free to negotiate better deals for themselves and change their minds at any time. Especially when Valve doesn't expect or require exclusivity, and enables those choices by having fairly open and developer friendly platform...
And anyone who thinks selling games isn't a business concerned with money is just lying to themselves. Grumbling about the role of money in the industry just seems baffling to me.
I mean to go along with the analogy. It's really more like Epic offering a better price to the orchard, and the orchard going with that. Tesco is free to haggle t keep that product if they want. And it doesn't matter how outraged Tesco customers are that the orchard sold their apples for a better price to a different store. The orchard isn't wrong for doing so. And neither is the store for offering a better deal.
It's only going to get worse from here on. In fact the entire industry is pretty much colluding to take down Steam at this point, before cutting up the pie among themselves.
No, that would be theft. Because those apples at the point of delivery will have already been paid for by Tesco. So that analiogy isn't quite right.
If you actually mean a supermarket finds out who supplies Tesco and rings up that supplier to try and get supply undercutting Tesco then yes, this happens ALL the time.
When I worked as a fruit and veg trader, ANY company that had Marks and Spencer as client would religiously be offered new contracts from customers and suppliers trying to find out what our recipes were, and then the supplier too.
Fun note, M&S at that time (1990s) had in their supply contract that you couldn't deal with tesco,. so yup it absolutely did happen and does.
But Ubisoft games are pretty mediocre at best so it's no big deal to me.
Whether you want Valve/Steam to have such power of the market is another thing though.
https://steamcommunity.com/app/552520/discussions/0/3058492678367772486/#c3058492678369280434
Now, Ubisoft is taking a long look at the Steam Deck and may come back in the future though. https://gamerant.com/ubisoft-games-steam-deck-one-condition/
I couldn't agree more.
Generally, I tend to think "the more the merrier", however in regard to Ubisoft, they are the company that excels in producing mediocrity regularly.
Every game is the same base cookie cutter open world ♥♥♥♥, devoid of any real meaning oe character, but instead filled with meaningless filler "fetch this, go here" content.
Aside from ZombiU, I've not seen anything remtoely interesting in them for years. Coupled with them contiuously repeating past mistakes about things like DRM, I do not welcome them one bit.
Well, to be fair on some here (not all, mind), it ain't always their fault.
Because they will often state their terms about what they are doing or intend to do, then the publisher steps in near release and changes things. And they're ♥♥♥♥♥♥.
Granted it's a pain in the arse either way, but it is a real issue.