Installa Steam
Accedi
|
Lingua
简体中文 (cinese semplificato)
繁體中文 (cinese tradizionale)
日本語 (giapponese)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandese)
Български (bulgaro)
Čeština (ceco)
Dansk (danese)
Deutsch (tedesco)
English (inglese)
Español - España (spagnolo - Spagna)
Español - Latinoamérica (spagnolo dell'America Latina)
Ελληνικά (greco)
Français (francese)
Indonesiano
Magyar (ungherese)
Nederlands (olandese)
Norsk (norvegese)
Polski (polacco)
Português (portoghese - Portogallo)
Português - Brasil (portoghese brasiliano)
Română (rumeno)
Русский (russo)
Suomi (finlandese)
Svenska (svedese)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraino)
Segnala un problema nella traduzione
But that ain't in my court, man.
I'm not an Argentine citizen. If I was, I'd be out trying to get this changed. I cannot help you here.
I'm sorry that the country is having issues like these - but the fact is that Valve *cannot change this*, and cannot support the rampant illegal activities that were going on *USING THEIR SYSTEM* to launder money. It was a big enough problem that it HAD to have this as a response.
And if you think for a second that any other large corporation isn't doing the same, guess again. World wide companies and corporations that deal with issues like these *absolutely* have to safeguard the millions of OTHER customers AND their own overhead, investors, or in valve's case their legal right to do business without being sued into oblivion.
There's not really much in the way of arguments that makes Valve bearing the risk for Argentina's volatile economy more attractive. I don't think you can criticize or shame Valve into enduring that risk.
This argument is bogus. Turkey and Argentina aren't directly linked together, and what happens to one doesn't necessarily have anything to do with what happens to the other. And it's likely the economic situations aren't actually identical or close enough to expect that anything happening to Argentina should be happening to Turkey at the same time.
Of course if Turkey's situation was to progress far enough to warrant similar restrictions from Valve that would certainly put the kibosh on your belly-aching. And I doubt you'd feel satisfied
"as long it was happening to some other failing economy too".
You are so missing the point.
I never said they are the same.
I was iterating that from VALVE'S point of view as a vendor taking payments, the EFFECT is the same.
And it deonmstrably is. What happned with Paysafe was that it got compromised in Eastern Europe (but iirc not over the rest of the world as some people could still use it in certain regions soon after). Valve removed it simply because when that happens there's question over whether they'll get payment or increased fees from their banks due to fraud and returns.
This is not markedly different. If an economy in a country got tits up (and yes, I know Argentina has never been good and it's largely down to their weird politics) then that immediately causes problems for vendors as there's instability that can cause EXACTLY the SAME problems as I've just mentioned.
This is also underlined by the poster a couple above me that demonstrates this happened before.
So I'm sorry but you misunderstood.