Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
Plus, the bans are often delayed, so that the hackers can't be sure which hack got them banned, and they can't warn the others about the details.
All you need is 1 player to run twos instances of CSGO on other computers (or Virtual machines) join the same server, and start kicking everyone out. you can effectively OWN a server by doing this and steam are doing nothing about it.
You still seem to be misunderstanding how the VAC system works.
It's not that it's slow to respond and false positives. That has nothing to do with it.
It's because the system is DELIBERATELY time delayed. If an idiot cheats, then it triggers the VAC system. If it banned immediately, or soon after, it would enable the cheater to easily work out which cheat caused the ban and they could then circumvent it easier.
But it starts a counter and any point in the next 30 days or so means they will get banned. And the beauty of that is that they won't know cheat triggered it.
That's the point.
I know it sucks with limited options in Australia, but you could try elsewhere close by too if you're really stuck.
My suggestion is kickban cooldown timer for a single set of players or a limit on how often they can vote to kick ban someone, and in cases where there is limited players, increase critical mass before kick bans can come into affect.
Sorry, but there's no way that'd be implemented as that's easily exploited.
You're someone who's a griefer, say. Go on a server, and get an acoomplice to ban you immediately. You've now got a cooldown to wreak havoc without recompense.
Pro tip - when you think of ANY suggestion to improve a system your first thought MUST be "would this be easily exploitable?"
And sorry, but yes, yours would.
Valve has zero say in what someone does on their private server.
no, thats not what i'm saying. I'm saying that there should be a cap on how often someone can kick ban or initiate a kick ban. i'm not saying a player gets a cooldown after being kicked banned but the kicker needs a cooldown.
Still exploitable.
That's the point. It just works the other way.
Go on their server, and using disposable accounts, bait them into baning. Then go in an wreak havoc.
See? This is precisely why I said before you offer a suggestion NEVER assume you've thought of it first and there isn't some way to exploit it easily.
How to Report: https://support.steampowered.com/kb_article.php?ref=1927-RTSV-6909
Kind regards.