安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
On PC I still sporadically play old DOS Yi-Gi-Oh games ("Power of Chaos" series), released last century and now (= 28+ years after date) I can still enjoy them.
And then there's another worry because PS4 charges a monthly fee just so that you can play online. Why would I need to pay for their Internet fees while I have Internet connection fees of my own to deal with? I mean, there's no other explanation for me (depending on the game type). Not to mention that if I play the same game on PC I can play multiplayer without any additional costs at all!
Then add this fun Steam community, a really cool (IMO) dedicated Steam controller, solid protection against nasties through the Steam guard app and you sometimes even get into contact directly with the devs on their awesome game forums.
The way I see things I saved a lot of money by not getting myself a PS4 and instead I spent some of that money on Steam. Now I can enjoy myself while playing games and knowing that I can continue to enjoy these games for many more years to come.
I don't necessarily dislike consoles mind you, I still keep my PS3 around for nostalgic reasons, but in the end I think it's a gigantic waste of money. If only they allowed modern versions to play games from older versions... that can't be so hard and would make a huge difference.
Well... their loss I'd say, good riddance too.
However, I've yet to find a reason to get a console. We still have plenty of games on PC, and there's a good chance that games can still be used on a new PC in a few years -- something that consoles never got, as new consoles won't play the games from the earlier devices.
Which might not even be possible, as game companies don't usually port all their games to the new console.
More games. PC gaming expands console gens.
Ability to use different controller types, might take a little research, but you can use many different types of controllers if you can connect them.
Modding. That Left 4 Dead 2 mod that replaces the coach with Winnie the Pooh Bear is entertaining, in my opinion.
My thoughts pretty much mirror Yatzee Crowshaw's. PC is almost always superior (though sometimes overly complicated i.e. the original Witcher or System Shock), but if the game studio and publisher are incompetent or contemptuous of their customers (EA), PC experience can suck far, far worse than even a mediocre console release. And, as previous gens' hardware wears out, and rights owners shut down virtual consoles, or try to extort people with a BS subscription service, stuff like the PocketGo and Dragonbox Pyra and Retroflag and DigiRetroBoy and GPD XD will continue to rise to prominence. I totally swore off consoles and returned to my PC gaming roots after Sony's Other OS debacle and Nintendo discontinued the Wii-U before it's time. The least the bastards can do is continue all the Virtual Console stuff from the Wii and Wii-U to the Switch, but they obviously don't want our money. Finally giving an official Mother 1 release and then ripping it away was unforgivable. Also, the Wii-U and 3DS Zelda HD remasters need to come to Switch.
Regarding the Crash of 1983, a few things:
1. ET wasn't responsible. Many of the attributes that are attributed to it's dismal failure were actually true of the other biggest failure of the time, Atari Pac-Man. In fact, the biggest cause of of the crash wasn't any single bad game, so much as market saturation.
2. While Nintendo's rise revitalized the gaming industry, it certainly didn't single-handedly "save video gaming." The PC gaming market had survived the crash just fine. Yeah, Tandy and Commodore and many of the other hardware companies went under or suffered huge losses, but the likes of Sierra and Origin and Broderbund remained strong, thanks to "IBM Clone" architecture providing a more or less stable, unified platform (not to ♥♥♥♥ on Apple ][e and C64 and Amiga fans. Those were also giants of the time in their own right. Love yah, Sabrina).
I wonder, are there any die-hard PowerPC architecture fans left?
Fast forward to now, and I've only picked up consoles many years late.
I'm fine with being on PC because PC has an extremely large (and basically infinite to the beginning of PC gaming) backcatalogue that I can potentially have access to. This backwards compatibility is unparalleled on any dedicated game system.
Also, I don't need to buy an extra machine to play my games if I'm gaming on PC. Can just use my cheapo school/work laptop for it.
You can play both console and PC you know.
An FPS with a controller? Forget it.
Well, consoles are pretty much small PCs. If you have enough money, PC will always be more powerful than the consoles since consoles cannot be upgraded and their price(the main reason why people plays on consoles) can't be too high so the hardware cannot be as well. Also, you have more games on PC as well as more freedom with the games files(modding, for exemple) and you don't need to pay a subscription to play online.