Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
That's a problem. Makes people get grumpy and accuse devs of "releasing broken games".
I do think it'd be nice if it was a more common practice for devs to say at least vaguely what kind of experience they think those specifications would get you. Maybe Valve could help encourage that by including a description field in that section of the backend, or something.
It's always going to be a bit up in the air though; there's only so many configurations you can test, only so much detail you can meaningfully give, and what's acceptable or unacceptable, stable or unstable etc is always going to involve some subjectivity. People ultimately need to be okay with a bit of uncertainty and/or with doing their own research. There's always the refund option if it's not up to your personal standards.