Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
Machiavellianism | 2.96 | 0.65
Narcissism | 2.97 | 0.61
Psychopathy | 2.09 | 0.63
There's the numbers, whatever they mean...
Narcissism 4.1
Psychopathy 3.7
Pretty accurate can't argue.
*psychopathy level increases*
N 1
P 1
i actually put some thought into this one. i've never really considered my myself overly manipulative or cynical or anything. interesting.
Narcissism 1.6/5, 6% Site, 1% US Adults
Psychopathy 1.4/5, 1% Site, 13% US Adults
About what I expected, think test is flawed for another reason, depending on circumstances/situation, we all become what we need to be.
e.g.
With sufficient anger = 100% psychotic
With sufficient pain = 100% Machiavellian
Thinking a bit outside my box for 100% narcissism, desperation/obsession.
Probably works well if you flip it around.
Happy = 0% psycho.
Pleasure/unfocused = 0% Machiavellian
Satisfied = 0% Narcissism.
Maybe too much playing with words and concepts. Fun test I guess.
Narcissism - 1.9
Psychopathy - 1.1
Have no idea what all that means.
you are 1-3 standard deviations below the mean in all categories, according to the table at the very end of the results page.
Below the mean...?
Excellent, I'm the -1%.
Narcissism 2.7
Psychopathy 2.2
Seems pretty average.
Like, what is "clever manipulation" exactly? Depending on the context, I either agree, or disagree completely.
Half-truths are one thing, and outright misleading people is another.
It creates a scenario where I'm neutral on most things, because of contextual reasoning.
so the 'normal' person just says 'neutral' to everything, which ... i mean, you know, that's ... that's not normal.
then in designing the test and creating a social circumstance wherein the test applies, one is ultimately undermining the 'deviations' one seeks to take advantage of. this is the main reason the project was cancelled on russia's side.
the other reason, which the establishment didn't really wany to acknowledge since it was looking for ways to use psychology for statecraft, is that the idea of such a test is problematic. you can't even verify people were telling the truth when they took it, let alone that they understood what you were asking and responded appropriately. such tests can't do anything to sort people; they just filter the rainbow according to ones concepts of diagnosis.
If these tests are taken to be valid, then the entire field is based on nothing. It's a self-fulfilling prophecy; not a scientific discipline.