安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
Down with all womyns.
Not because "haha look at the mainstream media being ignorant about video games haha," it's because it's parodying some of the things that I'm pretty sure actually happened during the GamerGate ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.
Yes, GG was originally about ethics of game journalism, but from what I saw, it turned into ♥♥♥♥-flinging hatred on both sides.
Second off, this is not the first episode that Law and Order has done that involve gamers. This is actually the third.
3rd - Women are actually highly discriminated against in the gaming industry. It may not be to the extream that is shown in this clip video, but it also would not suprise me. Most gamers know who Morgan Webb from G4TV is. She stopped posting to the message boards because of harrassment! The most asked question she got was "Are you really a gamer?". After that, it became a topic of people describing, drawing, and/or photoshoping her nude. Game developers are dominated by men. Look at most games out there that have women in them. They are typically animated with very little clothing - even when their male counterparts have full body armour!
Now I know a lot of you are going to point out some game where that does not happen. I can do that too. That is why I said most games do that. And I will be the first to admite that the trend of scantly clad women in games is going away; more and more women are entering the video game industry. But, it is still highly dominated by men.
Similarly, a show 'ripped from the headlines' in which lots of gamers are shown not doing anything bad but a couple are criminals is not 'bashing gamers'.
I guess the important thing is you can think circles around The Media.
Which is why it started out as a literal witch hunt, right?
All true (in my opinion) and many other shows have pulled the same stunt. On the flip side, I typically bash Law & Order for it's lackluster plot, boring characters that can only exhibit 1 or 2 emotions, and that every other episode is the same thing over and over again. Boredomfest: SVU would be a better title.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0DpxwN1o43E
The question of ethics was brought up because of the witch hunt (I think) of Zoe Quinn. The witch hunt was also before the term GamerGate became a thing.
But as I said, it turned into ♥♥♥♥ flinging on both sides of the argument.
Honestly, it just looks like SVU ran out of real storylines, not that it was ever a great show IMO. If you want to make a gamer look evil, either he's violent because he plays games, or, due to the context, he hates girls in games because... well, whatever the justification was supposed to be, probably something similar. If you want to make a white guy look bad in your lawyer show, he's evil because he's absurdly rich and pays people to kill witnesses, if you want to make a brown guy look bad in your cop show, he's a terrorist about to blow something up. Don't get me wrong, sterotypes are for the stupid, but so is most TV.
It started with a bitter ex bf making a rather long manifesto about how his ex gf is totally a cheating meanie and broke his heart. The bait gets taken by some sites of ill repute, who start hunting the witch. A number of incredibly long and incredibly stupid youtube videos get made, which extend the bf's original claim that she cheated to now claim that since she made a free game nobody heard about nor cares about, and since one of the dudes she kissed writes for a videogame blog, it was actually a plot to buy good reviews in exchange for sex. There were some fairly obvious problems with this claim, such as the nonexistence of any such reviews. Anyway, some guy takes one of the videos about the ex gf and how she's totes sleeping with everyone, and tweets it with the hashtag. This witchhunt, and others that followed it, have taken place under the name of gg and continue to do so.
So if you want to claim that 'ethics' popped up because of the witchhunt, you'd have to clarify that it was adopted as a way to deflect criticism of the unethical behavior of gg re: basically everything.
If you want to say that since things are named after they are invented, then that doesn't actually change the fact that the thing being named stays the same.