Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I want Asia to do well the investments are in sustainable and environmental businesses.
I want the war monger Pope. Death/War/End of Days. Pietro Parolin
Since he is not a Cardinal and part of the elections, he can´t win.
Actually, he cautioned against it. Stated sending weapons will leads to uncontrollable escalation.
https://www.vaticannews.va/en/vatican-city/news/2024-05/cardinal-parolin-nato-arms-in-russia-will-cause-escalation.html
Gotta check as many DEI boxes as possible.
Or at least forging a bull to that effect.
https://www.medievalists.net/2019/10/hadrian-iv-1154-1159-and-the-bull-laudabiliter-a-historiographical-review/
That is good argumentation and I am sure that he would be a solid choice.
But I don´t see him winning, despite the good arguments.
So you don´t think it will be Willem Jacobus Eijk...
But instead McElroy or Repole as future popes?
That being said...
Cardinal Peter Turkson looks like it. Black, commie, Leftist, and into social justice activism. He checks a bunch of DEI boxes, his only weakness is that he's not gay and a woman, but then neither are the other candidates.