安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
I want Asia to do well the investments are in sustainable and environmental businesses.
I want the war monger Pope. Death/War/End of Days. Pietro Parolin
Since he is not a Cardinal and part of the elections, he can´t win.
Actually, he cautioned against it. Stated sending weapons will leads to uncontrollable escalation.
https://www.vaticannews.va/en/vatican-city/news/2024-05/cardinal-parolin-nato-arms-in-russia-will-cause-escalation.html
Gotta check as many DEI boxes as possible.
Or at least forging a bull to that effect.
https://www.medievalists.net/2019/10/hadrian-iv-1154-1159-and-the-bull-laudabiliter-a-historiographical-review/
That is good argumentation and I am sure that he would be a solid choice.
But I don´t see him winning, despite the good arguments.
So you don´t think it will be Willem Jacobus Eijk...
But instead McElroy or Repole as future popes?
That being said...
Cardinal Peter Turkson looks like it. Black, commie, Leftist, and into social justice activism. He checks a bunch of DEI boxes, his only weakness is that he's not gay and a woman, but then neither are the other candidates.