Instal Steam
login
|
bahasa
简体中文 (Tionghoa Sederhana)
繁體中文 (Tionghoa Tradisional)
日本語 (Bahasa Jepang)
한국어 (Bahasa Korea)
ไทย (Bahasa Thai)
Български (Bahasa Bulgaria)
Čeština (Bahasa Ceko)
Dansk (Bahasa Denmark)
Deutsch (Bahasa Jerman)
English (Bahasa Inggris)
Español - España (Bahasa Spanyol - Spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (Bahasa Spanyol - Amerika Latin)
Ελληνικά (Bahasa Yunani)
Français (Bahasa Prancis)
Italiano (Bahasa Italia)
Magyar (Bahasa Hungaria)
Nederlands (Bahasa Belanda)
Norsk (Bahasa Norwegia)
Polski (Bahasa Polandia)
Português (Portugis - Portugal)
Português-Brasil (Bahasa Portugis-Brasil)
Română (Bahasa Rumania)
Русский (Bahasa Rusia)
Suomi (Bahasa Finlandia)
Svenska (Bahasa Swedia)
Türkçe (Bahasa Turki)
Tiếng Việt (Bahasa Vietnam)
Українська (Bahasa Ukraina)
Laporkan kesalahan penerjemahan
A lesser actor would have played it more serious and that would have been boring.
I can't think of a good replacement for Al, no one could have done it better.
watch him in casino, my cousin vinny, goodfellas
dam he was beast in those movies
micheal corleone is smarter than tony montana, we never see him fall in drug or destroy his own life, tony montana totally lost his mind when he killed his best bro and dig in his own cocaine
L attention span
I'd argue his intensity in the film was to an extent, a part of the whole greed message thing, whereas instead of being cold and calculated like what you said of a lesser actor, he was all ♥♥♥♥♥ up and high on life and just crazy in general, symbolizing his greed in a way that ultimately kills him.
Interestingly enough for Scarface, the film exists DUE to Al Pacino.
Scarface originally came out in 1932, and Al Pacino upon seeing it at the Tiffany Theater in LA iirc, called up his manager to express his desire in filming a remake of it.
Eventually, little by little, the pieces started to fall into place, as Scarface ('83) went from a period to a contemporary piece, the director became Brian De Palma, and the rest is history.