Asenna Steam
kirjaudu sisään
|
kieli
简体中文 (yksinkertaistettu kiina)
繁體中文 (perinteinen kiina)
日本語 (japani)
한국어 (korea)
ไทย (thai)
български (bulgaria)
Čeština (tšekki)
Dansk (tanska)
Deutsch (saksa)
English (englanti)
Español – España (espanja – Espanja)
Español – Latinoamérica (espanja – Lat. Am.)
Ελληνικά (kreikka)
Français (ranska)
Italiano (italia)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesia)
Magyar (unkari)
Nederlands (hollanti)
Norsk (norja)
Polski (puola)
Português (portugali – Portugali)
Português – Brasil (portugali – Brasilia)
Română (romania)
Русский (venäjä)
Svenska (ruotsi)
Türkçe (turkki)
Tiếng Việt (vietnam)
Українська (ukraina)
Ilmoita käännösongelmasta
A lesser actor would have played it more serious and that would have been boring.
I can't think of a good replacement for Al, no one could have done it better.
watch him in casino, my cousin vinny, goodfellas
dam he was beast in those movies
micheal corleone is smarter than tony montana, we never see him fall in drug or destroy his own life, tony montana totally lost his mind when he killed his best bro and dig in his own cocaine
L attention span
I'd argue his intensity in the film was to an extent, a part of the whole greed message thing, whereas instead of being cold and calculated like what you said of a lesser actor, he was all ♥♥♥♥♥ up and high on life and just crazy in general, symbolizing his greed in a way that ultimately kills him.
Interestingly enough for Scarface, the film exists DUE to Al Pacino.
Scarface originally came out in 1932, and Al Pacino upon seeing it at the Tiffany Theater in LA iirc, called up his manager to express his desire in filming a remake of it.
Eventually, little by little, the pieces started to fall into place, as Scarface ('83) went from a period to a contemporary piece, the director became Brian De Palma, and the rest is history.