Instalează Steam
conectare
|
limbă
简体中文 (chineză simplificată)
繁體中文 (chineză tradițională)
日本語 (japoneză)
한국어 (coreeană)
ไทย (thailandeză)
български (bulgară)
Čeština (cehă)
Dansk (daneză)
Deutsch (germană)
English (engleză)
Español - España (spaniolă - Spania)
Español - Latinoamérica (spaniolă - America Latină)
Ελληνικά (greacă)
Français (franceză)
Italiano (italiană)
Bahasa Indonesia (indoneziană)
Magyar (maghiară)
Nederlands (neerlandeză)
Norsk (norvegiană)
Polski (poloneză)
Português (portugheză - Portugalia)
Português - Brasil (portugheză - Brazilia)
Русский (rusă)
Suomi (finlandeză)
Svenska (suedeză)
Türkçe (turcă)
Tiếng Việt (vietnameză)
Українська (ucraineană)
Raportează o problemă de traducere
Excellent!
Meanwhile here in the rest of the world, inclusion and equal opposrtunities and basic empathy have been normal for many many decades and works extremely well.
It's almost as if you don't know what goes on outside your borders, ain't it?
Here, maybe this book might be beneficial for you:
https://img.ifunny.co/images/0e0d9ba58427b7db4be38be279f590b42c6efebcb49b63cde2bc0b4c2403a5cb_1.jpg
Pointing out someone else getting voted out demonstrates nothing to my claim.
I said that in the rest of the world we've done all this with our laws and out society for decades and it demonstrably works. How does pointing out ONE person got voted out for whatever reason mean it doesn't?
So I could use your weird logic and say "well Bolsanaro got voted out so that proves you wrong|" - except it doesn't does it?
Please stick to the point.
I don't know which video you mean, but I know why he won - ignorance and bad education.
Nice strawman.
Nobody's disputing whether he won. The claim at the moment is whether he's a capable person or not. He demonstrably isn't.
And that has NOTHING to do with whther he won or not. It doesn't change him being a moron.
I wouldn't tackle that pioint as it's compeltely moot.
The "no true scotsman" fallacy will never work. He IS a true Christian because all that is required is that you believe in God. That's all whether you like it or not.
Now whether he actually does or not in reality is also moot. Because religion doesn't mean anything to reality and should have absolutely no place in politics anyway.
SO yeah, I'd ignore this line.
You really need to work on your education man.
Imagine my shock.
The UK isn't exactly known for their education. They are known for their government sanctioned grooming gangs and locking people up for wrong think.
As for the fake 'pastor', I wonder when it will start showing empathy for the victims of illegal immigrants, instead of just the perpetrators. My guess is never. It seemed more concern about the supply of slave labor not being interrupted.
Ah the old "whataboutism".
Here's why that's moot. Nobody said the UK was an exemplary example of education. They could be and equally they could not be. It does not in any way change how America is does it?
See how logic works?
The fact is it is well demonstrated that this is how America has failed at education and you're now seeing the direct effects of it, where people are voting for things they know absolutely nothing about. Most don't even know the difference between left and right and vote against their own interests.
But even if the UK was the absolute worst in the world re: education, America still has those problems.
And do you know why?
Because ALL education requires checks and testing. How would you know you've picked up something correctly? You don't.
This is why I loved learning something like electronics when I was a kid. Back then I had no access to any teachers or any clubs or such that could teach me - only magazines and books. So I self taught. But I HAD GOT a self-check, a balance.
That is if I built something and I was wrong, it would either not work, or blow up or fail.
Reality was my check.
So no, self education is utterly useless without some form of check and balance.