Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chino tradicional)
日本語 (Japonés)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandés)
български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Danés)
Deutsch (Alemán)
English (Inglés)
Español - España
Ελληνικά (Griego)
Français (Francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandés)
Norsk (Noruego)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugués - Brasil)
Română (Rumano)
Русский (Ruso)
Suomi (Finés)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Informar de un error de traducción
Normas y directrices sobre discusión
21 
Denunciar este mensaje
the so called experts explained it to us, I'll sum it up for you
trillions and trillions of years ago the nothingness exploded and created everything, a bunch of rocks started flying and spinning around each other in a magical empty space. And then in one of those rocks life started from nothing, a complex cell came alive and it transformed into us. You're an evolved monkey on a spinning ball flying on a vacuum space. I know it sounds crazy but the experts said it, it's science.
NOBODY says trillions an trillions. It's about 4. 3 billion.
So yet again, way to strawman, and way to demonstrate you haven't a clue what you're rerferencing.
And you CANNOT claim something is wrong when you don't understand what you're disputing. Yet again this is another argument from ignorance fallacy.
Keep stepping on those rakes.
Yet more incorrect laughable claims, and not a shred of evidence to support your model. As I pointed out already, by dissing science you don't get ANY closer to it therefore being flat earth.
You can't.
The Luggage resists all methods of enquiry. You try and you'll end up inside and possibly never seen again.
He's a bit like a black hole - he kind of resists most methods of observation. All you can do is observe from a distance - a very safe distance.
sometimes the "experts" say 12, 14, 26, 4, lol it's like it doesn't really matter, they know it doesn't matter, they just have say a huge number and that's it
It all happened Concordillian years ago.
You know it may be ironic but it could be that scientists who refuse to acknowledge that time and speed of light are not constant have to constantly adjust their numbers because their data keeps giving them new results. So they toss out the previous values instead of addressing that the values they use are not constant.
I got banned earlier for pointing out that its science fact that light needs time to travel so all you can see is actually in the past. Somehow that is considered offtopic on how the world APPERS.
If seeing the world as round is proof that its round...
Then me seeing others as (blank) is proof that they are (blank).
I speak with my peers who also see them as (blank). So we practically gone through our own peer-review process so I got strong PROOF that the anti-science fakers here are indeed (blank).
Me calling them (blank) is merciful. They get mad and report me on it... what do they want? They want to me to not be so forgiving and call em frauds and liars instead rather than giving benefit of doubt?
What has happened over the years is exactly what I've descrobed before - we followed the evidence given.
The thing is as we gain more evidence we get to refine the answer. One of the big things we learned is radiometric dating - this alone allowed us to get more accurate data.
So yet again you don't understand rationality nor science. Because what gives you differnet answers is MORE science.
Ther has never once in history been science overturned by religion nor anything else has there?
So you don't get to poo-poo this and claim "nuh uh wrong".
They KNOW the speed of light isn't constant. What you're missplaying is a formula.
We use the speed of light through a KNOWN medium which is constant, because it's a base starting point.
It's so diofficult talking to people like you because you have no idea of what you're referring to and keep misapplying everything.
All while, still dodging any evidence to back up any of your claims. I won't forget because that's how logic works.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empirical_evidence_for_the_spherical_shape_of_Earth
Live cams or streams from "the other side" of the world.
For example, it is very early morning in Tokyo, compared to late afternoon in the East Coast:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLQhbRGv5qU
Most semi-long navigation between any two points of the world requires the world to be spherical in order to be precise, yet you do not hear from airplanes or ships getting lost or delayed.
Different lengths of day/night along the year and different places of the world can only be explained if the Earth is a sphere.
Is that supposed to prove the Earth is round?
If I see you as dumb. Does that prove you are dumb?
Some people see the world as flat (even high on a plane), others see it as round.
Only a fake world can pull this off in an objective reality. But do we live in an objective reality? Plenty of evidence suggests no, not at all. The real interesting thing about it is that peoples inability to see other's reality indicates that reality is indeed subjective.