Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
It’s the people driving those cars that should take the economic loss of buying an entirely new car?
Sorry but no, the correct answer is and will always be to hold the people damaging someone else’s property responsible and demand in the strongest possible terms that they face whatever legal consequence their action entails.
You mean like the US army, purposely destroying cars, shops, hospitals, etc in Iraq?
You can’t take issue with extremists until a crime has been committed. By then it’s too late.
Tends to happen when you become fascist shadowpresident.