安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
They won't do anything to fix it, because it is basically an unfixable problem - companies are not going to put down new factories where there is a small population that will be hard to recruit enough workers from, especially with the automation of modern factories most of the positions are management/supervisory rather than large amounts of semiskilled workers, so the factories will be built near sizable population centres.
Probably the best such communities can hope for is a longer term switch to WFH as normal, which would make all places equally able to have decent jobs available because everywhere would be an even footing.
That's why Donald The Schrödinger Trump started to act unlike ANY other President.
I can elaborate what i am saying but i don't have the keys to open that box where "two different realities are true at the same time".
You don't know what you are saying please explain it to me without a link or a news posts, explain it to me in your own words.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It9nqIImpb8
Also worth mentioning is that China is currently climbing the value ladder to high tech, high value added manufacturing while low cost productions are either being moved inland to less developed parts of the country or exported to other lower cost countries. A lot of developing countries cannot successfully transition to high tech and fall into the middle income trap but China is different because it is currently an innovation powerhouse with a huge talent pool.