is truth in the eye of the beholder?

[Caldari Ghost]

is truth in the eye of the beholder?

[crunchyfrog]

Nope.

Truth is empirically demonstrated. That's how reality works.

If there's no empirical evidence for something, you shouldn't believe it.

OPINIONS are in the eye of the beholder.

[Sir Seanicus, Esq.]

Yes.

What I view is the truth is not the same as others. Thankfully, it's ok for them to be wrong. Nobody's perfect.

[crunchyfrog]

Sir Seanicus, Esq. eredeti hozzászólása:

Yes.

What I view is the truth is not the same as others. Thankfully, it's ok for them to be wrong. Nobody's perfect.

No, that's conflating subjective with objective.

YOur sujective opinions to YOU is always correct, and might change for another person.

But truth is objective and as such CANNOT be open to interpretation.

For example, you can say "I like the colour blue". Another person might say they don't - that's subjective and fine.

But you CANNOT say "the colour blue is bright pink". Because that's objectively wrong and can easily be empirically demonstrated as such.

[Prinny]

beauty is in the hole of the behinder

[qb]

there isnt actually any truth to be precise, its just a made up word.

[Abaddon the Despoiler]

You can't handle the truth!

[Mina]

Perspective

[Sir Seanicus, Esq.]

crunchyfrog eredeti hozzászólása:

Sir Seanicus, Esq. eredeti hozzászólása:

Yes.

What I view is the truth is not the same as others. Thankfully, it's ok for them to be wrong. Nobody's perfect.

No, that's conflating subjective with objective.

YOur sujective opinions to YOU is always correct, and might change for another person.

But truth is objective and as such CANNOT be open to interpretation.

For example, you can say "I like the colour blue". Another person might say they don't - that's subjective and fine.

But you CANNOT say "the colour blue is bright pink". Because that's objectively wrong and can easily be empirically demonstrated as such.

It's ok, Crunchyfrog.

You can be wrong. Nobody's perfect. I accept you for who you are, bestie!

[Menzagitat]

who knows

[crunchyfrog]

Sir Seanicus, Esq. eredeti hozzászólása:

crunchyfrog eredeti hozzászólása:

No, that's conflating subjective with objective.

YOur sujective opinions to YOU is always correct, and might change for another person.

But truth is objective and as such CANNOT be open to interpretation.

For example, you can say "I like the colour blue". Another person might say they don't - that's subjective and fine.

But you CANNOT say "the colour blue is bright pink". Because that's objectively wrong and can easily be empirically demonstrated as such.

It's ok, Crunchyfrog.

You can be wrong. Nobody's perfect. I accept you for who you are!

I can be wrong but guess how you demonstrate it?

EMPRICAL OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE.

Sorry you are demonstrably wrong. What you are talking about is subjective. It is IMPOSSIBLE for something to be true to one person objectively and something else to another.

[Sir Seanicus, Esq.]

crunchyfrog eredeti hozzászólása:

Sir Seanicus, Esq. eredeti hozzászólása:

It's ok, Crunchyfrog.

You can be wrong. Nobody's perfect. I accept you for who you are!

I can be wrong but guess how you demonstrate it?

EMPRICAL OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE.

Sorry you are demonstrably wrong. What you are talking about is subjective. It is IMPOSSIBLE for something to be true to one person objectively and something else to another.

It's ok. ✨I accept you regardless.✨

[Prinny]

MojolnirRecon-54 eredeti hozzászólása:

I’ve never heard that

Pronnu eredeti hozzászólása:

beauty is in the hole of the behinder

^ This one I have.

Eat it every day?

[Defenestration]

Not always, one's perspective doesn't always align with reality.

[crunchyfrog]

Sir Seanicus, Esq. eredeti hozzászólása:

crunchyfrog eredeti hozzászólása:

I can be wrong but guess how you demonstrate it?

EMPRICAL OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE.

Sorry you are demonstrably wrong. What you are talking about is subjective. It is IMPOSSIBLE for something to be true to one person objectively and something else to another.

It's ok. ✨I accept you regardless.✨

Let me ask you this very simple question.

If I say something is one thing, and you say it is another, how we do we get to the truth of what it actually is?

It's empirical evidence, thus demonstrating that objectivity is not the same as usbjectivity.

[Chesmu]

Who is this beholder that has just one eye? since you didn't say "Eyes" I'm assuming it's not human.

So, the eye on the pyramid of the dollar bill, or the eye of devil ;) which one we talking bout