60 fps better than 100 fps

[InfinityJosh]

So I have a 100 hz monitor and tried both, I prefer 60 fps, don’t like the 100 fps, am I wrong or someone others prefer 60 fps?
I talk about age of empires 3 (rts) and grid 2 (racing).
No improvements in DOOM 2016 (fps).

[talemore]

The light is the FPS

[talemore]

Първоначално публикувано от Starlight:

Първоначално публикувано от talemore:

The light doesn’t travel in FPS

Neither does a bullet.

Yes it does if you record it by frames

[secuda]

The eye dont messure in fps. Imagine the trouble it would cause if it did?

[St✩rlight]

Първоначално публикувано от talemore:

Първоначално публикувано от Starlight:

Neither does a bullet.

Yes it does if you record it by frames

So does light, if you could find a camera fast enough to capture light in slow motion.

[InfinityJosh]

Първоначално публикувано от Chaosolous:

Първоначално публикувано от LeviathanWon:

Personally, I think 60 fps at 1080p is still really good...

1440p and 4k are really easy on the eyes but 1080p is by no means ugly. 60FPS is fine too. Hell, I think 30FPS is fine TBH.

People calling anything under 4k and 300FPS unplayable have opinions unworthy of the air they're expressed on.

I like 1920x1080p in racing games but also 1280x720p in fps.
FXAA I love it, the blur is part of game experience, especially in GRID 2 (racing) makes it more cool.

[talemore]

Първоначално публикувано от Starlight:

Първоначално публикувано от talemore:

Yes it does if you record it by frames

So does light, if you could find a camera fast enough to capture light in slow motion.

Nothing to record as nothing can travel faster that you can't record it.

[A&A]

It depends on the game.
Racing, rts, city builders are fine with 60FPS because what can an extra 40FPS bring? Nothing interesting because you're looking at a landscape. Even 45FPS should be fine.

[Fajita Jim]

Първоначално публикувано от talemore:

Първоначално публикувано от Starlight:

So does light, if you could find a camera fast enough to capture light in slow motion.

Nothing to record as nothing can travel faster that you can't record it.

https://youtu.be/EtsXgODHMWk?si=QtfIMUsgb1wiYVMu

[TGC> The Games Collector]

Your PC does need to generate each frame, so the higher the framerate, the more work for your gpu, and more chances it dips.

And usually a stable framerate is more preferable.

[talemore]

Първоначално публикувано от Fajita Jim:

Първоначално публикувано от talemore:

Nothing to record as nothing can travel faster that you can't record it.

https://youtu.be/EtsXgODHMWk?si=QtfIMUsgb1wiYVMu

It's the stream of light who make you see the light that you can't see the light even when it's there.

So even if you would try to record it, that data would be false. Since that data is limited to the speed of light.

To record it you need ludicrous speed.

[InfinityJosh]

Първоначално публикувано от talemore:

Първоначално публикувано от Fajita Jim:

https://youtu.be/EtsXgODHMWk?si=QtfIMUsgb1wiYVMu

It's the stream of light who make you see the light that you can't see the light even when it's there.

So even if you would try to record it, that data would be false. Since that data is limited to the speed of light.

To record it you need ludicrous speed.

Faster than light is not proved yet

[A&A]

Първоначално публикувано от talemore:

Първоначално публикувано от Fajita Jim:

https://youtu.be/EtsXgODHMWk?si=QtfIMUsgb1wiYVMu

It's the stream of light who make you see the light that you can't see the light even when it's there.

So even if you would try to record it, that data would be false. Since that data is limited to the speed of light.

To record it you need ludicrous speed.

But light can be absorbed by a semiconductor, causing an electron-hole pair to be generated, so why shouldn't you be able to see a single photon?

[LeviathanWon]

Първоначално публикувано от Infinity Josh:

Първоначално публикувано от talemore:

It's the stream of light who make you see the light that you can't see the light even when it's there.

So even if you would try to record it, that data would be false. Since that data is limited to the speed of light.

To record it you need ludicrous speed.

Faster than light is not proved yet

Measure. And it is dependent on the compound and materials that are used to send the light from one end of the tunnel to the other end, so to speak. I bet we could go faster then it is now when applied to data. It will get better and better as time goes on.

[talemore]

Първоначално публикувано от LeviathanWon:

Първоначално публикувано от Infinity Josh:

Faster than light is not proved yet

Measure. And it is dependent on the compound and materials that are used to send the light from one end of the tunnel to the other end, so to speak. I bet we could go faster then it is now when applied to data. It will get better and better as time goes on.

Darkness may travel faster but we have no way to record it.

[Nimsosim]

https://youtu.be/H9kZTm4Xm-8?si=P-rDAwqD-XUMJzyM