安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
This security is as well a place to work as the worker is considered unable to produce anything of a value.
Majority of jobs don't produce anything of a value.
Majority of work tasks are on a broad scale of things worse alternatives.
As example is paper-bags can be made out hemp for a lot lower cost with higher quality.
For this reason, communism has as well been described as failed capitalism since the state need a strategy to survive who doesn't rely on random events.
For that reason we can't see that we live inside a communism.
2022 covid pandemic -> 2023 covid gone; hello?
The reason is that the state owns the hospitals but people are too healthy to justify keep them running. But if we shut down all hospitals we don't have any doctors. There's a huge industry on creating useless jobs in the hospital sector.
The state rehire the nurses who quit working in a 3rd party company and seen as a bribe.
We have a choice to shut down the fire department since there are no dumpster fires who keep on burning.
But if we have no fire department when the day come it's for the best of the economy to let the nature to take care of the buildings who are on fire by the human factor?
Those woods didn't start to burn on their own. Neither did the houses. Human error is spared by the communist helping the human from an error. The most in need of help are helped since they are in need of help compared to a capitalistic view the broken and bleeding should die first since they're not paying.
You could argue that Thomas Sankara was a an excellent example of a benevolent dictator. Leader of the tiny African coutnry, Burkina Faso. Unfortunately he was assassinated in a military coup by a traitor who was basically the living stereotype of a corrupt president. Thomas himself though did a lot to reform his country and eliminate the need for foreign aid. He had a lot of policies that were determined to make his country self-sufficient. Many of his policies focused on preventing famine, agrarian reforms, land reforms, literacy campaigns and support for vaccination (for stuff like polio, measles and yellow fever). His government also went out of its way to forbid female gential mutiliation and forced marriages. If you know anything about west Africa, this would be considered extremely revolutionary. He also made a point to appoint many women to cabinet positions where they otherwise would have been forbidden on the basis of culture. He also praised things like contraception and removed any restrictive access to it.
Was it perfect? Absolutely not. But he was making very real and positive changes in a very volatile environment. It's just a shame that he was assassinated. Also, he certainly wasn't making any friends with colonial powers and French leaders in particular hated him. Which of course, might have had something to do with him being assassinated.
Very fascinating guy though.
In practice: This is something else.
As for benevolent dictators, they are far far far outnumbered by malevolent ones. Power corrupts. A single will should never control the fate of the many.
Unfortunately that is an age old argument. Is it better to have a benevolent dictator or a corrupt democracy? Often times a benevolent dictator can bring about more positive change for the average person and do so rapidly, but there is the risk that their successor won't do the same, but still hold all the power that comes with being a dictator. On the other hand, corrupt democracies tend to leads toward stagnation as the people suffer under oligarchy. But on the other hand, there are often more opportunities to remove such leaders, but it comes increasingly more difficult overtime.
I think systems like market socialism and liberatarian socialism are the answer to these pitfals. At least with market socialism, you can avoid some of the failures that have accompanied command economies. In the framework of libertarian socialism, power is not centralized in a single body, so you avoid the issues that come with authoritarianism as power is vested in a decentralized county system under a united front.
I pretty much reject all forms of libertarianism. I understand the virtues, but I think it is extremely naive of human nature. On par with the elimination of motivation under pure communism, the idea that some central authority does not need to exist is doomed to failure.
As soon as one social element can convince another to join up at the expense of the rest, the very type of coercion that was being avoiding is directly caused. Far better for there to be a central will, but that will arise from the agreement of the whole in accordance with a social contract rather than collusion of the few to subvert it.
Delicious paper!
The only time it could EVER work is in an imaginary "post-scarcity" Star Trek-like world where everything is made with molecular replicators.
even in star trek they resort to giving peoplr energy credits aka a limit on how much they can replicate.. basicly a basic income but still currency..
and items like handmade items, naturally grown ingredients, homecooked meals.. archelogical finds.. antique chateaus in france still very much are pricatly owned and while not sold for cash.. they are very much used to barter favors.
acces to transporters and interplabetary travel is also quite limited.. if you dont have friends in high places your stuck to much slower ways of travel..
so basicly yeah in startrek you get your flat.. but it wont be in the location where you want.. you get as much replicated food and clothing as you can use.. but not acces to real nice hoising and real food.. or land to grow it on.. you also most likelu wont have acces to holodecks and fast teams..
even apolying for the star trek acedemy.. needs the support of an excisting officer..
the currency in the federation is "favors"