Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
Someone's gotta do it.
answer = DURRRRR
thread = solved; ur welcome
They are waiting for the one person to say the quiet part out loud and get them a perma-ban.
It is a part of natural selection to reproduce.
Is it because I called you out as a eugenicist in the first post?
Poorer people in countries with lower religious adherence, such as East Asia and Europe, have significantly fewer kids, than poorer people in more religious countries like the US.
And then you have lack of education in general, and lack of economic opportunities for women - if they are even allowed to work, unfortunately this is still shunned, if not forbidden, in many places.
There is some relativeness as to what is "poor". Many families still have the old age ideal that family is everything, and do not mind putting most or vast majority of their resources into things that help sustain it.
Others, especially in the developed world, have a personal ideal, and prefer to spend more in things that are not strictly necessary, like hobbies, travel, etc., and these people tend to have fewer kids later in life, or not at all.