Video Games are NOT art, and they don't have to be
I used to believe in the "games are art" narrative, but as the years gone by and my finances and tastes changed, I realized that video games are not art. In fact, I would go so far as to say that classifying games as "art" has greatly damaged the medium.

Games can contain artwork, music, you name it. But just because art is a part of the development process doesn't mean the final product is "art." If games were art, they wouldn't be produced and assembled on a factory line, hauled into trucks, brought into stores, stocked on shelves, sold and bought by millions.

And by classifying games as art, it attracted people who don't know anything about video games. Just people who hear the word "art" and plug their ears for everything else. Gamers complain about their hobby being "destroyed," but if games are "art," then don't act surprised when the "art types" show up.

The "art types" are especially egregious, because they are of the opinion that if it's art, then it's good. That's why some games have horribly written and questionable stories, but dismiss certain criticisms with the classic art type phrase, "You just don't get it." The type of people who play walking simulators and Sony movie games.

In fact, classifying these as "video games" is holding the medium back. If you ask, me as entertainment becomes more digital, there should be more labels and distinctions. Instead of "movie game" we call it "interactive narrative." For games like Uncharted, for example, what exactly is game-like about it? What is the goal other than "finish the story?" What are the penalties for not reaching that goal? Are the penalties severe enough/too lenient?

Look, video games shouldn't need to be an art-form to be legitimized. Think of it like this;
Pong
Pac-Man
Sonic the Hedgehog
Doom
Halo
Spider-Man
The Last of Us
All of these are under the classification of "video game," and yet one of these is very clearly NOT like the other. It just seems that the "games as art" narrative has outlived it's purpose, because imo that narrative only exists to counteract the "games cause violence" narrative.

Video games are not art
And that's OK
引用自 mldb88:
引用自 Knee
another “people shouldn’t like things I don’t” but under the guise of “games are not art”

I never said that you can't like things, but I guess expressing an unpopular opinion is the same as imposing it on others. I just think that the "games are art" topic gets a lot of buzz, but not enough real discussion. If you think games are art, then that's fine. I wanted to offer a different take on the situation and encourage discussion.


If I wanted to say "people shouldn't like things I don't," then I would say that.

I think the point of your post that people kind of miss is that games shouldn’t need to be considered art to be legitimized, which is something I can get behind.

Though just want to say, the whole “you just don’t get it” argument to deflect criticism is also used a lot with ♥♥♥♥♥♥ art in general, it’s not something wholly unique to the games industry. The “games as art” movement just brought in a flood of pretentious poorly conceived trash that used “art” as an excuse for poor quality. There are some great games made under the premise of being somewhat artistic, but like with most things it brought on a slew of horrid trash using art to deflect people calling out flaws.
< >
目前顯示第 16-30 則留言,共 34
Walach 2024 年 4 月 10 日 下午 4:03 
I'd say that as long as someone say that something is art, it is.
At least to themselves. :P
Amaterasu 2024 年 4 月 10 日 下午 7:45 
The thing is that when people think of art, they think of the masterpieces. All art is, is a creative endeavor. A six year old creating macaroni versions of his or her family is art. Belching the national anthem... though profane... is also art.

Video Games are a creative endeavor and thus classify as art. Art can literally be anything as long as some creative effort was put into it. That's why cooking is described as culinary arts.
Ben Lubar 2024 年 4 月 10 日 下午 7:47 
saying "video games aren't art" is art
fluxtorrent 2024 年 4 月 10 日 下午 7:58 
Is cinema suddenly not art because they made a south park movie? It's sure as hell different than Saving Private Ryan.

No OP, you are wrong.
IFIYGD 2024 年 4 月 10 日 下午 9:40 
引用自 Pork Chop Sandwiches

Video games are not art
And that's OK
And I counter:
Video games are art, even if you don't find the art appealing.
And that's OK.

The same way that it's OK that I don't like most Picassos or Warhols, or most country or rap music.
Just because I am not a fan of it, doesn't mean it isn't art.
Ben Lubar 2024 年 4 月 10 日 下午 9:51 
引用自 Pork Chop Sandwiches
Games can contain artwork, music, you name it. But just because art is a part of the development process doesn't mean the final product is "art." If games were art, they wouldn't be produced and assembled on a factory line, hauled into trucks, brought into stores, stocked on shelves, sold and bought by millions.

By this logic, the Mona Lisa is not art. You might want to rethink that.
Soren 2024 年 4 月 10 日 下午 10:04 
引用自 Ben Lubar
saying "video games aren't art" is art
It's actually a pretty unoriginal and a non-creative argument. So there is some debate about it not being art.
Paratech2008 2024 年 4 月 10 日 下午 10:46 
Some art isn't Art. Iron Man 2 made fun of that idea.
Blitz4 2024 年 4 月 10 日 下午 10:59 
i was with you until i read the OP and how it covers 3 different unrelated things
examples would've painted a better picture. painted, get it.
Shreddy 2024 年 4 月 11 日 上午 12:01 
A game can’t have any artistic value beyond the retail price due to the way they are mass produced, so it’s art in a legal sense but nothing beyond that. As for the IP itself, that’s debatable but it can’t really be art without the game to hold it all together. That’s not without saying that incredibly talented artists work on games and produce stunning artwork assets that are used for production.
Zarineth 2024 年 4 月 11 日 上午 12:03 
引用自 Shreddy
A game can’t have any artistic value beyond the retail price due to the way they are mass produced, so it’s art in a legal sense but nothing beyond that. As for the IP itself, that’s debatable but it can’t really be art without the game to hold it all together. That’s not without saying that incredibly talented artists work on games and produce stunning artwork assets that are used for production.
So music, poetry, computer graphics are not art? They are also mass produced.
Soren 2024 年 4 月 11 日 上午 4:38 
引用自 Shreddy
A game can’t have any artistic value beyond the retail price due to the way they are mass produced, so it’s art in a legal sense but nothing beyond that. As for the IP itself, that’s debatable but it can’t really be art without the game to hold it all together. That’s not without saying that incredibly talented artists work on games and produce stunning artwork assets that are used for production.
The whole topic here is just a "high art, low art" discussion really. Without most people realising it of course.

Fun fact about high art and low art. The Titanic (movie) used to be considered low art when it first came out. Later it became considered high art by most cinema critics. It's funny how most things considered low art by previous generations can become widely accepted as high art in just a few decades.
SanekiBeko 2024 年 4 月 11 日 上午 5:31 
What the heck is art nowadays? You can put a urinal on display and call it art.
TGC> The Games Collector 2024 年 4 月 11 日 上午 5:39 
Just because your fancy newfangled PC can show 8k grapfix and the pixels and physics and whatnots, doesn't mean old games weren't artfully crafted.

You kids are just spoiled.

Pong is art!
Mega Ultra Chicken 2024 年 4 月 11 日 上午 5:46 
This post should be saying some modern games are not art and it doesn't have to be.
最後修改者:Mega Ultra Chicken; 2024 年 4 月 11 日 上午 5:49
< >
目前顯示第 16-30 則留言,共 34
每頁顯示: 1530 50

張貼日期: 2024 年 4 月 10 日 上午 11:30
回覆: 34