Steam installieren
Anmelden
|
Sprache
简体中文 (Vereinfachtes Chinesisch)
繁體中文 (Traditionelles Chinesisch)
日本語 (Japanisch)
한국어 (Koreanisch)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarisch)
Čeština (Tschechisch)
Dansk (Dänisch)
English (Englisch)
Español – España (Spanisch – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (Lateinamerikanisches Spanisch)
Ελληνικά (Griechisch)
Français (Französisch)
Italiano (Italienisch)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Ungarisch)
Nederlands (Niederländisch)
Norsk (Norwegisch)
Polski (Polnisch)
Português – Portugal (Portugiesisch – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (Portugiesisch – Brasilien)
Română (Rumänisch)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Finnisch)
Svenska (Schwedisch)
Türkçe (Türkisch)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisch)
Українська (Ukrainisch)
Ein Übersetzungsproblem melden
SBI detected was specifically created to review bomb games and organize the review bombing of games.
Which I'm pretty sure is against Valve's T.O.S.
If you violate Valve's T.O.S., they have every legal right to ban you. That's how it works.
As for the other stuff...
Considering the behavior of some people, SBI hardly had to use what little pathetic influence they have to get journalists to write hit pieces on certain neckbeards and manchildren.
Companies getting state funding is nothing new or unusal 'cause that happens in my country too. I can even point you to some embarrassingly bad games here on Steam that were made by companies receiving state funding. Check out the awful, awful, Autobahn Police Simulator 2.
This whole drama about SBI was started by a bunch of YouTubers desperate to stir up some made up drama so they can grow their channels.
That's all this is.
So if that was the case, why wasn't the curator banned?
The curator was essentially just saying "hey, this insidious company has their fingerprints on this game, avoid it". It's not telling people to review bomb it. Although, people probably will anyway lol.
You can't just apply motives to people and expect Valve to do what you want. But that's what SBI did anyway.
You obviously have some issues with bias if you label everyone that disagrees with SBI as "neckbeards" and "manchilderen".
At the same time, their reaction to the whole curator thing was the sole reason i even found out they even existed. So, they do have influence of some kind, and i do thank them for showing who they were, by trying to ban some poor sod on the internet.
Have a look at the game I'm talking about.
https://store.steampowered.com/app/1319850/ValiDate_Struggling_Singles_in_your_Area/
I was perma banned by the dev for "hateful content" when I simply asked "where's the white people in this game?" was it trolling? yeah, kinda, but I dont think it was worthy of a perma ban lol
Then, to find out 2 years later, the woman who made this POS game works for SBI, and also refuses to hire white pleople for her dev studio was hilarious
Something to keep in mind, the next time you go at someone about "crappy hentai games".
Insults. The primary tool of everyone lacking an actual argument.
You fail to realize that's a bad thing. My tax dollars should not be funding propagandists that actively work against my gender and race.
False. People talk about it, because they have a long history of saying they don't like such things.
A lot of people aren't fake. They actually believe what they say.
Mostly negative checks out
You don't even have to see the reviews man. The store page and btw, that artstyle says it all.
Sucks for the artist unless they enjoy being associated with ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥, but that artstyle is used a lot by wokies.
Exactly. It's so easy to spot.
lol. lmao even.