How do you remember Anne Frank ?

[WeeHawky]

How do you remember her?

[Triple G]

Diposting pertama kali oleh xDDD:

I mean a lot of money has been made out of Anne Frank's diary.
Doesn't have to be Holocaust denial to say the diary is fake. Kind of like how there have been many Jewish accounts that have been fake and made-up.

Doesn't necessarily mean the whole thing was fake, but means some people were cashing in on it for either wealth or fame.

Yes - but they don´t have enough money to bribe a couple of independent scientists. It´s not that the diaries were looked at once as well - it happened a couple of times with decades passing by in between it. And there were 30 million copies sold of it - so it´s not like Harry Potter, which sold 600 million copies.

And it´s part of the holocaust denial, as the same people who brought this up also said that the whole holocaust is made up and never happened. It´s a conspiracy theory, which has the same roots.

[permanent name]

Diposting pertama kali oleh Triple G:

Diposting pertama kali oleh xDDD:

I mean a lot of money has been made out of Anne Frank's diary.
Doesn't have to be Holocaust denial to say the diary is fake. Kind of like how there have been many Jewish accounts that have been fake and made-up.

Doesn't necessarily mean the whole thing was fake, but means some people were cashing in on it for either wealth or fame.

Yes - but they don´t have enough money to bribe a couple of independent scientists. It´s not that the diaries were looked at once as well - it happened a couple of times with decades passing by in between it. And there were 30 million copies sold of it - so it´s not like Harry Potter, which sold 600 million copies.

And it´s part of the holocaust denial, as the same people who brought this up also said that the whole holocaust is made up and never happened. It´s a conspiracy theory, which has the same roots.

you're conflating two inconvenient facts so that you don't have to care about either of them.

[Defective Dopamine Pez Dispenser]

As an innocent light shining amidst the most profound darkness of the 20th century, who somehow, despite facing among the greatest evils in history, continued to believe that "people are really good at heart." Which makes what happened to her an even more profound evil.

After reading her diary, the footnote at the end coldly and matter of factly stating her subsequent fate shook me when I read it, and still does.

[Morkonan]

Diposting pertama kali oleh CHUD:

I question the legitimacy of the book as some of it was written in ballpoint pen before ballpoint pens were invented.

https://www.annefrank.org/en/anne-frank/go-in-depth/authenticity-diary-anne-frank/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ballpoint_pen
(First patent issued in 1888)

From some info I looked at a few days ago and didn't post, because... just "why?" Ballpoint pen use was not widespread during the war years, but it did begin to be quickly picked up in the late 1940's.

Anyway you look at it, you're wrong.

If you would like to access the original study done to verify the authenticity of the diary, you can contact Teh Interwebz.

[Morkonan]

Diposting pertama kali oleh Triple G:

Diposting pertama kali oleh permanent name:

what's the point in making anytihng up?

I don´t know. Tell me why people come up with things like some parts were written with a pen, when there´s no evidence for it. Or that it´s used to brainwash people. Or that it´s made up in any way, when these diaries are visible for the public and have been examined several times, and every letter in it is identical to Anne Frank´s handwriting?

Any enthusiastic "denier type" will come up with fifty-eleven reasons why ____ in order to overload rebuttals. By the time one of the wack-a-mole conspiracy theories has at least halfway firm ground for being debunked, they'll say... "But, whatabout" and then declare victory, citing the "overwhelming" amount of "evidence" that hasn't yet been refuted.

Every segment of crackpotism does this. You can find it from UFOs to ghosts to 9/11 and on. The mountains of non-evidence are presented as evidence simply because of their... volume.

Want to cast doubt on something? Just machine-gun posts about various "whataboutisms" of all shapes and sizes, each in its own thread, each with a thousand words describing the reasoning behind it, the more distantly connected the better... Now you can claim that there is enough "reasonable doubt" to question whatever it is, like... questioning "gravity" based on seventy different threads offering "proof" of themselves... Don't worry about a lack of support, either - "If you build it, they will come."

This is the same principle that the whole Q-Anon garbage was born from and even _chan couldn't stomach it.

[rosteri3]

dont care about her. if she would lived then nobody would care. also 8th class german history sucks

[SvarogX]

Diposting pertama kali oleh Weehawky 4MoreYearsPause:

How do you remember her?

What does that even mean, remember her ?

I know that she existed and the history and story surrounding her.

Can you specify the question or have you only opened this up to troll and trigger people again ?

[CHUD]

Diposting pertama kali oleh Morkonan:

Diposting pertama kali oleh CHUD:

I question the legitimacy of the book as some of it was written in ballpoint pen before ballpoint pens were invented.

https://www.annefrank.org/en/anne-frank/go-in-depth/authenticity-diary-anne-frank/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ballpoint_pen
(First patent issued in 1888)

From some info I looked at a few days ago and didn't post, because... just "why?" Ballpoint pen use was not widespread during the war years, but it did begin to be quickly picked up in the late 1940's.

Anyway you look at it, you're wrong.

If you would like to access the original study done to verify the authenticity of the diary, you can contact Teh Interwebz.

This dude uses annefrank.org as a source

Lol

Lmao

[Morkonan]

Diposting pertama kali oleh CHUD:

This dude uses annefrank.org as a source

Lol

Lmao

Well, if there's something else you'd like to be wrong about today, you're free to post it.

[CHUD]

Diposting pertama kali oleh Morkonan:

Diposting pertama kali oleh CHUD:

This dude uses annefrank.org as a source

Lol

Lmao

Well, if there's something else you'd like to be wrong about today, you're free to post it.

I'm right, you're wrong. Sorry.

[Holding These Alligators Down]

Anne Frank?
I hardly knew her.

[Pieshaman]

Diposting pertama kali oleh Morkonan:

Diposting pertama kali oleh CHUD:

I question the legitimacy of the book as some of it was written in ballpoint pen before ballpoint pens were invented.

https://www.annefrank.org/en/anne-frank/go-in-depth/authenticity-diary-anne-frank/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ballpoint_pen
(First patent issued in 1888)

From some info I looked at a few days ago and didn't post, because... just "why?" Ballpoint pen use was not widespread during the war years, but it did begin to be quickly picked up in the late 1940's.

Anyway you look at it, you're wrong.

If you would like to access the original study done to verify the authenticity of the diary, you can contact Teh Interwebz.

what people probably not know at all, in dutch schools you get to learn to write with a fountain pen. ballpoint is only allowed after primary school. If you even bring a normal pen to school you might get lynched and robbed of all your milkmoney by the teacher (well that just figuarly but you get the point)
the myth about ballpoint penn is utter bs, there was no kid writing with a ballpoint even if they would have exist at that time. I born in 1985 not even get to use one in school untill 12 year after.
It's a dutch school thing.I've also seen the diaries ofcourse and it not look like ballpoint at all so it just cringe that this myth even exist.

[ZZZZZ]

Diposting pertama kali oleh Pieshaman:

Diposting pertama kali oleh Morkonan:

https://www.annefrank.org/en/anne-frank/go-in-depth/authenticity-diary-anne-frank/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ballpoint_pen
(First patent issued in 1888)

From some info I looked at a few days ago and didn't post, because... just "why?" Ballpoint pen use was not widespread during the war years, but it did begin to be quickly picked up in the late 1940's.

Anyway you look at it, you're wrong.

If you would like to access the original study done to verify the authenticity of the diary, you can contact Teh Interwebz.

what people probably not know at all, in dutch schools you get to learn to write with a fountain pen. ballpoint is only allowed after primary school. If you even bring a normal pen to school you might get lynched and robbed of all your milkmoney by the teacher (well that just figuarly but you get the point)
the myth about ballpoint penn is utter bs, there was no kid writing with a ballpoint even if they would have exist at that time. I born in 1985 not even get to use one in school untill 12 year after.
It's a dutch school thing.I've also seen the diaries ofcourse and it not look like ballpoint at all so it just cringe that this myth even exist.

neither was she dutch nor did she visit dutch schools.. but even that is completely irrelevant since u can still write with other pens at home, its not like theres a law for it

[G 80]

Who?

[JD]

What crime did she commit? And why is she dead?